REV06353 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C~ H1QQ1nS, 743 F.2d 984, omitted). ... • 994 (3d Cir.1984) (emphasis Gardner, at 1518. Thus, the bankruptcy courts' jurisdiction over a given issue or claim is based entirely on the relationship between the underlying bankruptcy proceeding and the asserted claim. The more direct the relationship, the stronger the argument in favor of jurisdiction. The Court finds that the Board's request to reopen the case to enforce and interpret the confirmed Plan is merely a cloak to make the request appear like a core proceeding. The County does not need the shelter of this Court to enforce its rights under the Plan as they are enforceable in the state court. Its claims are unimpaired, =hey exist post-confirmation with the state law rights and remedies held before the bankruptcy petition was filed. All of the creditors had notice and are bound by the Plan's language which permits the ~ounty to exercise those rights and remedies in the =_tate courts. To the extent the Count: 's rot sati_fied that the ?lap's repayment terms have been met, it should exercise its rights under the Plan to enforce its state law remedies. Thus, the Court concludes that at best its jurisdiction over the Board's request is related to the administration of property through the Creditor's Trust. The Court notes that the 10th Circuit recognizes a confirmed plan is like a contract. ?aul •~. Monts, 906 F.2d 1468, 1476 (10th Cir. 1990). The Bankruptcy Code's enforcement and modification provisions pertaining to Chapter 11 plans do not preempt a claim outside of the bankruptcy court for breach of contract premised on the plan of reorganization. Tom; see generally, _Tn re BankEast Coro., 142 B.R. 12 (Bankr. D. N.H. 1992); In re Penrod, 169 B.R. 910, 916 (Bankr. N.D. Ind.1994), aff'd, 50 F.3d 459 (7"' Cir. 1995). Typically, the state arena is the appropriate forum to resolve claims based upon an alleged breach of the provisions in a plan confirmed several years earlier. Logically, if the contract that is the confirmed plan leaves .the creditor unimpaired, it is intended that the creditor will exercise its (along with any additional claims based upon the new contract) outside of the bankruptcy court. Although jurisdiction ^as been round over the matter, cause has not been shown to reopen the case. The County has abundant protection and relief under state law and should be able to adjudicate its rights both fully and promptly in the state courts. The County's claims do r.ot :-voive matters uniquely suited or those Which in the interest cf =•ustice would require further review by the bankruptcy court.