Laserfiche WebLink
SCOTT SMITH ID~9707283100 SEP 04'00 14 34 No .004 P.10 <br />• <br />,. <br />• requirements of the DMG re: reclamation. Stilt you may expect the audit as promised <br />within the 30 day period as agreed. <br />6) Please double heck with Mr. Shuey re: non-standard inspections. His unannounced <br />8/l8/00 group trespass inspection was reported to me by third parties on or near the <br />date of the receipt of your letter. If wck traffic on a road that exhibits no signs of <br />failure generates weekly inspections for the life of the pit-then so he it! Mr. Shuey <br />should know by now that ] am not adverse to his weekly inspections ,he's a <br />personable enough guy. <br />Lastly, I plan to submit a customized version of the survey accurate site map to document <br />the boundary issue mentioned above. It will conform to DMG standards for such maps <br />and show the PSCo area in a blow up detailing. I shall incorporate the monitoring data, <br />setback from the pipeline, drainage detailing etc.. Pathfinder remains unclear as to what <br />additional data would be needed-I plan to request that information from Mr. Shuey <br />tomorrow, 8/29/00. 1 do not anticipate that any TR subtnitted by Pathfinder will address <br />PSCo slope issues. It is my understanding that the engineering firm SRK and others have <br />been asked to submit proposals to the County re: slope stability analysis. ]t would seem <br />that since this slope is within their jurisdiction that would be a proper venue for future <br />slope remediation issues. <br />Sincerely, ~ ~ ~~ ~/ <br />l <br />SCOTT E. SMITH, (pres) <br />PATHFINDER DEVELOPMENT <br />PS. I remain confused as to the DMG approach to the PSCo license agreement? The <br />document refers to an easement that does not impact the haul road or pit. ]t may or may <br />not even exist from a legal standpoint. Under any legal scenario that 1 have seen described <br />PSCo will have to subordinate to the existing approved uses on the property including <br />heavy truck traffic no mauer what the outcane of any litigation. Can you give me the <br />legal rationale upon which you rely when you state I )That "DMG considers Pathfinder's <br />