Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DCpdrlmenl of Ndlnml KC~Unf(C5 <br />1111 $henn,in $1 , Kuum ? I S <br />Dunvcr, l nlnrarlu HIl'?Il l <br />Phnnr 1.111 fl HOb~ I .LI <br />FAX: (IU71 N 4_'-11100 <br />January 16, 1996 <br />Ms. Kathleen Welt <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />P.O. Box 591 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />Re: Liability Insurance, West Elk Mine (Permit No. C-80-00'n <br />Dear Ms. Welt: <br />~~ <br />I~~~ <br />DEPARrMEM OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />RnY Rwnw <br />Guvcmur <br />Innw, S. luchhe.,d <br />E.ermive I~nruur <br />non hacl H Lang <br />Divisuin Uurarn <br />On January 2, 1996, we received the attached certificate. The certificate verifies that insurance <br />exists for Atlantic Richfield Company and all of its subsidiaries. The certificate does not verify <br />compliance with Rule 2.03.9 for the following reasons: <br />The certificate is too vague. Given the unknown number of entities covered, there is not <br />sufficient specificity to ensure that the West Elk Mine is individually insured to the required <br />limits. Competing claims could jeopardize the mine-specific coverage. <br />Ideally, the Mountain Coal Company, West Elk Mine would have its own policy. In the <br />absence of this option, the certificate should at least specify that the coverage applies to the <br />West Elk Mine, Permit No. C-80-007. <br />2. Please indicate how many (approximately) different entities are covered by this policy. <br />3. The cancellation clause must be amended to remove the wording "endeavor to" and "but <br />failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the <br />company, its agents or representatives." <br />Please address this matter as soon as possible. Your assistance is appreciated. <br />A. Berry <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />DAB/bjw <br />Enclosure <br />\B1 W\W ELT. DAB <br />