My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV05731
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV05731
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:04:20 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:27:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/10/2000
Doc Name
CC&VG CRESSON PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ADEQUACY REDVIEW MARCH 2000 AMENDMENT 8
From
BERHAN KEFFELEW
To
JIM PENDLETON
Type & Sequence
AM8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the Amendment No. 8 application. However, no reference to the East Cresson Extension <br />mine area is contained within the East Cresson mine section of the "Project Description". <br />General Permit Concerns <br />Each of the three separate mine pit wall slope stability reports addresses the potentially <br />destabilizing effects of water. Water can destabilize the mine pit walls by reducing effective <br />stress on potentially skidding surfaces, and by increasing the driving pressure on the <br />potentially failing rock mass. As Adrian Brown Consultants observed; "The combination of <br />these two effects is that mine wall stability is a strong function of ground water conditions." <br />Mine's excavated beneath a standing ground water table can result in seepage from saturated <br />bedrock into the mine pit. He presence of ground water can, therefore, result in less stable <br />mine walls. <br />Historically the Cripple Creek and Victor areas were mined largely by underground mining <br />techniques. Ground water seepage into underground workings necessitated dewatering and <br />caused roof and rib instability. As in many historic mining areas, dewatering tunnels were <br />driven beneath the ground mass being mined to dewater the ore body and eliminate ground <br />water problems. In the case of the Cripple Creek and Victor mining area three tunnels were <br />driven. Each subsequent tunnel was a thousand feet deeper then the previous one to allow <br />mining to progress deeper in the diatreme. The Moffat tunnel was installed at 9,000 feet <br />above sea level in 1900. The Roosevelt tunnel was installed at B,000 feet above sea level in <br />the 1920's. The Carlton tunnel was installed at 7,000 feet above sea level in the 1940's. <br />These tunnels appear to have been relatively effective in dewatering the overlying rock mass. <br />Each of the three separate mine pit wall slope stability evaluations concluded that because the <br />rock mass is dewatered ground water will not destabilize the pit walls. The past decade's <br />experience in the Main Cresson Mine has verified the analysts' assumption. However, the <br />Main Cresson pit immediately surrounds the Cresson underground workings, known to <br />connect directly to the Carlton Tunnel. The possibility exists that mine pits excavated farther <br />from the dewatering tunnels may encounter ground water conditions. If ground water is <br />encountered by any of the Cresson mine pits, the stability of the effected pit walls will <br />need to be reevaluated by CC&VG in a timely fashion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.