Laserfiche WebLink
C~BVvOLD MNG. CO. ID~~19-fi39-324 FEB 03'94 8:18 No .003 P.03 <br />exmeme metal concenastiont beeausc they drain aline workings (not mine dumps) in deposits <br />• where sulfides are contained in discttte veins, and thus have access [o only limited voluttrs of <br />sulfides and rock materials during weathering. <br />The stxond type of waters are those which drain molybdenite- and fluorite-rich waste <br />dumps of the C71max porphyry molybdenum deposit (McNulty Gulch sample, Table 3): that <br />waters fall in the high-acid, high metal class (Figure 2). Low pII values (near 1.9) prcsuu~ably <br />rcsul[ from the tntidadon of pyrite ptrsent in the waste dumps and the lack of buffering <br />nracdons with the silicato-rich dump mazerial, however, non-extreme Zn and Cu <br />concentrations (20-40 ppm each) probably tetlect the sclailvcly low amounts of sphalerite and <br />chalcopyrite in the Climax ores. Due to the large amottnta of fluorite in the waste dump <br />material and their low pH, lire Climax dump waters have extreme Fluorine concentrndons near <br />900 mg/L. Interestingly, tuanium is the dominant moral in the Climax waters other than iron <br />and alttarinum: the eztrttne U conccnnadons near 90 ppm most likely result from the low pH <br />of the warrss, the U~nrichcd granitic intrusive hoe[ rocks, and ilte high availability of F in the <br />waters to complex the urtudura <br />Acid-low metal <br />Two tlraittarpet rarapltd to date have acid pH values but carry low dissolved base metals <br />(less than 1 ppm sum of metals); these include the Pau-Me-By shine near Stunmitville and the <br />natural acid tlraitmge along South Mineral Crtxk near Silverton (Fig. 1). Both these watts <br />drain pyito-rich tfissetninated sulfide rt»nerttluadon in rocks with moderate to low acid <br />buffrstrtg capatslty. Both have low dissolved oxygen i< 5 ppm) but high sulfate (500.660 <br />ppm) and dissolved Fc (50.140 ppm). The lack of base metal transpon by these waters may be <br />due to (1) low t:atounts of base metal sulfides in the ate deposits, and/or (Z) the noted far <br />ground waters to have dissolved oxygen daring weathering ro stimulate microbial catalysis of <br />sulfide oxidation (Nordstrom, 1982}. <br />Near-neutral waters with extreme, high, and low metal content <br />Drainages wlth the highest pli values txcta in deposits with high acid buffeting capacities, <br />including those with (1) carbonate host tucks err abundant carbonau gangue mint:zals (I.eadville <br />Urain, liandora, French Oulch, Kokomo mines), (2) host rocks altered to calcite-rich propylitic <br />ts+incral essemblagrs (volcanic-hosted epithermal deposits drained by the Rowley Tunnel <br />(Sonanra district] and American Tunnel [Eurel~ district)), or (3) host rocks containing <br />abunriantrtacdvo aluminosilicate glasses (some volcanic-hosted epithetmal deposits (Miner's <br />Creek at Ctrede], and Au-Te deposits at Cripple Creek [Calton Tunnel]). Hhst-rock <br />composition can significantly affect water concentrations of sturte dissolved species. For <br />example, wants which have interacted exteruively with fe]aic vdcanic rocks generally contain <br />elevated Na (IU-80 ppm), K (1-10 ppm) and Li (1U-30 ppm). <br />Near•neuval waters with high to extmme dissolved base meta! contenu (as highas 270 <br />ppm SM) drain nrincs in pyrite- and sulfide-rich deposits (Bandota, Rowley, I.eaeiville Dmin, <br />French Gulch. Kokomo). These include waters with tow DO (< 0.1 ppm) that carry no <br />hydrous Fc-oxide (tIPO) particulates in suspension, and waters with high DO (up to 8 ppm) <br />that carry some iiF'O particulates. 7.inc is generally the predominant heavy mere! in [hose <br />' waters. The abundance of Zn reflects dtc lack of sorption by particulate HFO (Smith et al., thLs <br />volume;; Smith et al„ 1992) <br />Near-neutral waters with ]ow base metal concentrations form itt deposits with low pyrite <br />contents (Carlton, Swathmorc, Huron, Miners Creek, Dauntless). DO concentrations in these <br />waters also vary widely. <br />SUMMARY OF CONTROLS ON DRAINAGE COMPOSITION <br />The dominant controls on drainage composition in divexse orz deposit types include <br />geologic conrols (such as mineralogy, host rerck alteration, etc.), exurnal controls (such as <br />• <br />