My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV05301
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV05301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:03:48 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:24:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/1/1984
Doc Name
EXHIBIT A
Type & Sequence
HR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e ~ -~, ~, <br />UTAH INTERNATIONAL INC. <br /> <br />BOX 187 - CRAIG- COLORADO 81625 <br />303-824-4407 <br />April 6, 1981 <br />• <br />Mr. Jerry Zimpfer <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Room 423, Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Jerry: <br />I have recently reviewed your memo to Rich Dominque critiquing Trapper <br />Mine's proposed criteria for sediment volume in our sedimentation dams. As you <br />have aptly noted, sediment generation is not always directly in proportion to <br />precipitation. The studies you cite, however, are for undisturbed drainages and <br />the phenomenon of decreasing sediment yield with increasing precipitation is <br />largely explained by the accompanying increase in vegetation (see attachment). <br />The sediment storage criteria we are describing, however, is based on runoff from <br />disturbed and denuded areas- The relationship between sediment yield and preci- <br />pitation would therefore be expected to be directly proportional. Our assump- <br />tions, then, remain valid since we are comparing sediment yield from disturbed <br />lands in Kentucky per Curtis (1974) to expected yields from disturbed lands in <br />Colorado. Your reviev further fails [o account for [he data.described from the. <br />Black Mesa Mine in our estimate of probable sediment yield, nor does it acknow- <br />ledge the calculations using site specific data following the EPA's publication, <br />"Preliminary Guidance for Estimating Erosion on Areas Disturbed by Surface Mining <br />Activities in the Interior Western United Slates". <br />We have provided three separate methods of calculating sediment storage vol- <br />ume for Trapper Mine, each of which corroborates the other. The methods use site <br />specific precipitation data, site specific TSS data, and site specific runoff <br />data. <br />Jerry, I would appreciate [he opportunity to discuss [his with you further <br />if there are still questions regarding [he validity of our estimates. <br />Sincerely, <br />Wayne E. Sowards <br />Assistant [o Mine Manager <br />Trapper Mine <br />n <br />U <br />l.'ES/ js <br />cc: Rich Dominque <br />Carol Pahlke <br />Hike Savage <br />File <br />bcc: R. C. Diederich <br />R. E. Nelson <br />G. M. Stubblefield <br />N. Krishnamur[hi <br />K. W. Watson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.