Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 4 <br /> the fact that there was no notice of violation issued; there are <br /> 2 two different components. One regards, I think we all agreed the <br /> 3 rock falls down hill. It's been stipulated--or not stipulated-- <br />' 4 but I think there is a significant amount of evidence to indicate <br /> 5 that as these rocks came down the hill, there was some damage to <br />' 6 s <br />d <br />b <br />h <br />k <br /> ome <br />egree; some <br />us <br />es, some trees were <br />nocked down. <br />I' 7 There was some degree of disturbance to soils, and <br /> 8 those occurred, and then when the rocks reached the bottom, they <br />' 9 are now in the state to where I heard no evidence to indicate <br /> 10 that they are causing any on going hydrological or any kind of <br />' 11 damage whatsoever. <br />' 12 The issue in my mind is as it is in all of ours, with <br /> 13 that in mind, is that a violation? And is that a continuing <br />' 14 violation? If it is, I think that's a really close call but, in <br /> 15 my mind in this particular issue, I don't think that there was a <br />' 16 violation on that. <br />' 17 I think it's very close, and I think that in the event <br /> 18 that more rocks or materials were to continue to Pall, that given <br /> 19 a future reseeding, I might find a violation even involving those <br /> 20 types of facts. <br />' 21 I think we need to recognize that that the depography <br /> 22 that that disturbance causes in that area is such that, just like <br /> <br /> 23 the 1930 slippage that was related to, from time to time, rocks <br />' 24 are going to fall off of steep slopes and off of cliffs and off <br /> <br />1 25 of areas and fall down hills and roll down hills and are going to <br />