My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV05242
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV05242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:03:41 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:23:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/8/1993
Doc Name
ENERGY FUELS MINING CO RATON CREEK MINE PN C-82-055 PERMIT RENEWAL RESPONSES
From
ACZ INC
To
MLR
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 1993 Raton Creek Mira "Adequary Reryonsa ~ S <br />EFMC needs a preliminary indication from the OMLR relative to whether or not any <br />issues associated with the revised reclamation plan submitted in conjunction with <br />EFMC's S/92 Renewal Adequacy Responses can be mutually resolved through <br />discussions with OMLR Staff. If the OMLR indicates that this approach is feasible, <br />EFMC could then format and submit the revised reclamation plan and associated <br />responses as a technical revision for OMLR review and approval. <br />5. Rule 2.07.6(1J(d)(v) requires that operatoss obtain uxtivers from persons occupying dwellings <br />that lie within 300 feet of the permit area. A4ap I, "General Area and Property Ownership ; <br />indicates the proximity of certain occupted dwellings to the permit area. Please advise us as <br />to the location of the waivers from the owners of these dwellings. <br />Response: A trailer, previously located within the mine permit boundary and used as <br />a temporary residence, was removed from the site shortly after mining operations ceased. <br />The only other residences within 300 feet of the mine permit area, are owner by the <br />primary surface landowner, A.J. Iuppa, and his son James Iuppa. There is some question <br />as to whether both residences are within the 300 foot limit. EFMC will verify the <br />distance of both residences from the permit boundary and has contacted the Iuppa's <br />relative to submittal of the required waivers. Once the question of applicability is <br />resolved and the waivers are received from the Iuppa's, EFMC will forward copies of the <br />waivers along with any necessary documentation to the OMLR for insertion in the <br />Permit document. <br />6. Page 562 of the permit addresses the potential for gravity discharges from the sealed portals. <br />Please update Item No. 1 in this analysis, including the data that you now have concerning <br />mine discharge pumping ratez Also, Item No. 2 on page 562 states that the portals are not <br />located near the low point ojprojected mining. Please provide data showing the location of <br />the portals in relation to the acttra[ mine workings. Please provide an analysis of expected <br />water pressure fxhind the portal seals, and how the seals will resist failure under these <br />conditions. Finally, please address whether there are any drill holes in both of the mine <br />workings that can be used to monitor the flooding of the mine workingz <br />Response: In order to adequately respond to the OMI,R's concerns relative to potential <br />gravity discharge from the underground workings, EFMC is proceeding with additional <br />research of historical records, documentation of mine elevations relative to know water <br />levels and discharge points, and preliminary evaluation of the potential and magnitude <br />of any hydraulic head which may be established. This effort is complicated by relatively <br />limited mine inflow data due to low volume intermittent flows and potential hydraulic <br />connexions with the other abandoned mine workings which occur throughout the <br />permit and adjacent areas. <br />EFMC proposes to present and review available information with appropriate OMLR <br />Staff in the immediate future, and, based on this review to discuss and evaluate the best <br />means of identifying and mitigating any potential related concerns. Due to the <br />complicating faxors noted, a detailed hydrologic study may not provide sufficient <br />information to determine postmining hydrologic conditions with any degree of certainty. <br />We anticipate that other options, possibly including a general hydrologic evaluation along <br />with limited monitoring to verify assumptions/conclusions, may be the most practical <br />and effexive approach. <br />A:~Y56RF5 P.LTR <br />avosios fpm ACZ Inc. * P.O. Box 774018 * Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 * (303J 8796160 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.