My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-10-30_REVISION - M1977208
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977208
>
2007-10-30_REVISION - M1977208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:29:24 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/30/2007
Doc Name
Response to adequacy review letter
From
Cemex
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR9
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oct 30 2007 7:SOf1M Cemex Inc. 303 823 2199 p.5 <br />Ms. Erica Crosby <br />October 29, 2007 <br />Page 4 <br />• Set up a pumping syrtem in the southwert pond to move water firm this pond into mater truckr ured <br />for road watering or other conrumptive are, thereby rrdueang the impact of thin pond on C-Pit. <br />• Once the ?008 irrigation rearon rnmmencer in /Ipril--May 2008, monitor the C-Pe't highwall far <br />reepage, mamtor the r'sned patron of the Canal and monitor worry leveLr in tl~e routhwertpond <br />• GFt12EX wit! continue to explore wayr to rue the C Pii water in the proars that do not nears <br />other adverre effects. <br />• Propose alternatives to water spraying ar a dust rupprerrant in the C-Pit aria for approval under <br />the CPDHE Title VAirPernrit. <br />If their it no tign~cant reduction in obrerved inflow to C-Pit via 1Jre western highwall a'unng next <br />rummer'r irrigation rearon, CEMEX will conduct further mvertigationr to determine the rourre(rJ of the <br />inflow. There invertigatianr may include additional flaw gauging in the Cana! at dacatianr further to the <br />north thare stye gauging ronducled by Brown and Caldwell during rummer 200?, and/or inrtallation of <br />additional piezameterr. <br />If it it determined that seepage is rian~cant along one or more partionr of the rspproavnately 1,900Joat <br />reach went of C-Pit that it cut into bedrock, CEMEX will eroordlnate with Northern to determtne the <br />available optionr to lint the canal to reduce reepage in this ann. <br />3. The report indicates that leakage from the A-Pit water line is a possibility due to the past <br />occurrence of the line breaking and the fact that the highwall in the vicinity of the A-Pit <br />[sic] is wet Please provide a plan to investigate the condition of the A-Pit water line and a <br />mitigation plan in the event water is migrating into the C-Pit <br />CEMEX Response: AltF.augh it it trite that limited array of ice formation have been obrerved in the <br />part in the rhaded portions of the northeast GPit highwall during the winter montlzr, CEMEX proporer to <br />defer tertritg the fl-Pit /tree at this lime, pending the tuults of the prngrv~o out/saed afiove. Converrationr <br />with the contractor who ins7aded and maintain: the A-Pit /tine indicate that bared an hir experience, tin'r <br />type of line rarely hay rmall kaki, but rattier ready to perform err intended or fail duo to h'ne breakage, at <br />which dime repairr air made. The line u a 6-inch HDPE line with tbermaUy welded jaintr. Water from <br />tbir rystem rontinuer to be rucressfu!!y delrbered to the cement plant spray tower without any indication of <br />Torres. Part experience with thir line has rhvwn that arty rigrriftcant leaks quickly exprerr themselver err wet, <br />panted arem~ an the rurface, due to the rhallow roily overlaying the bedrock along the pipek'ne mute. <br />In the event that the what we currently befieve to be the major rotn~ce of inflow to C-Pit (reepage from the <br />Feedn Canal and dart ruppresrran mater) rr eliminated, and C-Art water lens/. rontdmre <o rise, CEMEX <br />will conduct hyd%rtatic tertin& to confirm whether err not any leakage is detectable. This wiJ,~ entail <br />presrurizing the line while cla~ing the valve at the dirclrmge end of the yrtem near the spray tower. If the <br />line does not hold prerrure, the ryrtem will be rout down, the /ins read be a"rainzd afall water and cleanzd out <br />by wring compmrred air, and the syrtem will then be filled with pre;rurized heliumgar. Helium gas deteclarr <br />will be used to nmdk the alignmext of the pipeline and determine tAe hcatian of t1>e leak err leaks, and She <br />leaks will be repaired ifthey are located in an area that may be af~ctin8 C-Pit. <br />4. CE1~ffiX is required to monitoring [sic] wildlife on the site in the vicitity of C-Pit. <br />Please inform the Division if the wildlife monitoring and reporting plan will change as a <br />result of the backfilling of a majority of the pit and the recently installed net on the exposed <br />wafer in the C-Pit. <br />CEMEX Response CEMEX nail zvntinue to monitor wildlife in the C-Pit vicinity. Thlr it part of <br />daily operations monitoring pmgram. No evidence of wildlife outride ofpigeons bar been abrerved in the C- <br />Draft Response to t0-5-07 Adequacy Review TR-9_REV2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.