My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV04421
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV04421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:02:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:17:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/22/1994
Doc Name
TR 29 ADEQUACY REVIEW KEENESBURG MINE C-81-028
From
DMG
To
COORS ENERGY CO
Type & Sequence
TR29
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866 7567 <br />fAX: 1703) 832 8106 <br />MEMO <br />July 15, 1994 <br />TO: Shawn Smith <br />From: Tony Waldron "C <br />RE: Keenesburg Mine (C-81-028), Technical Revision No. 29 <br />II~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCE <br />Roy Ramer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />F..ecunve Dvecmr <br />Michael B long <br />Dinsion Diredo~ <br />Per your request, I have reviewed the technical revision submittal <br />(TR-29) to update the revegetation plan for the Keenesburg Mine. <br />Overall the revision is well organized and greatly clarifies the <br />sampling methodology that will be utilized at the mine site to meet <br />their present and future sampling commitments. <br />There is one statement on page 114-c that will require some <br />clarification prior to approval of this revision. The first <br />sentence at the top of the page states that a combination reference <br />area/technical standard will be used to evaluate revegetation <br />success at the Keenesburg Mine site. However, the body of the text <br />seems to indicate that the revegetation success will be based on a <br />comparison of the reclaimed area and the Osgood reference area. It <br />is unclear how or if a technical standard will be employed here. <br />To my knowledge the Division has not approved a technical standard <br />for this mine site and if the operator wants to assign a technical <br />standard, more information will need to be submitted for this to <br />occur. They can contact me to discuss what that will be. <br />Another item that will require some fine tuning prior to final bond <br />release sampling is if the reclaimed area will be sampled as a <br />single area or divided into parcels. Zt is probably too soon to <br />determine how this will be handled since all of the area has not <br />been reclaimed. However, prior to beginning the final bond release <br />sampling or even phase II sampling, this should be clarified with <br />the Division. <br />This concludes my review. If you have any questions, please <br />contact me. <br />AJW/ajw <br />cc: David Berry <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.