My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV04364
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV04364
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:02:28 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:17:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/27/1998
Doc Name
Phase II/III Bond Release App, TOC, Sec. 1 Thru 3 & Tables
Type & Sequence
SL3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 1998 Hoyden Gulch Mine • Phase 1 fr 3 Bond Release Application ~ PaRe 7 <br />The revised 1996 data also indicates that production in the primary reclaimed area (164.4 grams <br />per squaze meter [g/mZ ~ is much greater than the production in the reference areas (aspen: 95.7 <br />g/mr; chokecherry: 107.3 g/m'; oak brush, 108.4 g/mt; and, sagebrush: 63.7 g/m~. Perennial <br />grasses dominated production on the reclaimed area. All of the reference areas showed higher <br />perennial forb production than the reclaimed area with the exception of the Explosive Storage <br />area. <br />The woody stem density in 1996 for the primary reclaimed area was 301 stems per acre, or <br />1509'0 of the standard. With the exception of Topsoil Pile `B", the non-contiguous areas all had <br />stem counts which were considerably higher than the primary reclaimed area. <br />1997 17ata <br />Table 5, Statistical Evaluations for the 1997 Data for the Primary Reclaimed and Reference <br />Areas, presents summary statistics for the 1997 vegetation sampling. Table 6, 1997 Absolute <br />Cover Data, summarizes cover data for the primary reclaimed area and the four reference areas. <br />Table 7, 1997 Shrub Density Data, summarizes shrub and half-shrub density data for the <br />reclaimed areas. The 1997 vegetation monitoring data indicates a similar trend as that observed <br />in 1996. Several of the reference areas had greater vegetation cover than the primary reclaimed <br />area. In 1997, the aspen reference area had the greatest vegetation cover (90.4%), followed by <br />the oak brush reference area (81.6%), the chokecherry reference area (79.4%), the primary <br />reclamation azea (77.6%) and the sagebrush reference area (74.8%). The 1997 absolute cover <br />data indicates that the aspen reference azea had the greatest ground cover (97.2%) followed by <br />the chokecherry and oak brush reference areas (94.8%), the oak brush reference area (94.0%) <br />and the primary reclaimed area (93.7%). The absolute cover for the non-contiguous areas is <br />• similar to absolute cover in both the primary reclaimed and reference areas. <br />The 1997 data indicates that production in the reclaimed area (239.0 g/m~ is more than double <br />that of the production in the reference areas (aspen: 91.1 g/mr; chokecherry: 97.0 g/m'; oak <br />brush, 94.9 g/mt; and, sagebrush: 103.5 g/m~. Perennial grasses dominated production in all <br />study areas with the exception of the aspen reference area which was dominated by perennial <br />fortis. All reference areas showed higher perennial forb production than that in the reclaimed <br />area with the exception of the Explosives Storage azea. <br />The woody stem density in 1997 for the primary reclaimed area was 336 stems per acre, or <br />168% of the nandazd. As in 1996, with the exception of Topsoil Pile "B", the non-contiguous <br />areas all had stem counts which were considerably higher than the primary reclaimed area. <br />Reclamation Success Criteria <br />As shown in Tables 2 and 5, cover and production samples generally met sample adequacy <br />requirements. With the 1996 data, the number of reclamation productivity samples were <br />adequate for the original analysis, using the sample location method and statistical evaluation <br />procedures approved by DMG. When the data were re-analyzed to account for the change in <br />sample location selection methodology, results indicated that the statistical test for minimum <br />sample size was not satisfied. However, given that the reclaimed area productivity is much <br />greater than any of the reference areas, sample adequacy is of little concern. Shrub density did <br />not meet statistical minimum sample size adequacy requirements using "standard" statistical <br />• <br />Montgomery Watson Americas (d6a TerraMatrizJ • PO. Box 7740]8 <br />Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477' (970J 879-6160 <br />W. ~I1nM1v I GJ Rmd Rdrr Aylumn~TU~pv:4J Rond Rdav AgJimn <br />]nNDIJ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.