My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03836
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:47 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:12:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/28/1994
Doc Name
FAX COVER WESTERN AGGREGATES MINING APPLICATIONS
From
ROCKY FLATS FIELD OFFICE
To
PLANNING & INTERGRATION
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL-28-94 THU 15 ~ 04 • FAX N0, 303 94775 P, 04 <br />®RAFT <br />The :[lock Creek area contains substantial areas of jurisdictional wetlands. Additional <br />docurnentation is required in classification and mapping of the wetlands and subsequent handling <br />of these by the Army Corps of Engineers if the wetlands are to be altered in any way. <br />CERCLA <br />T'he existing permitted acreage plus the 425 acre expansion azea are located on lands owned by <br />the iJnited States Department of Energy, Rocky Flats. The whole of the Site is listed on the <br />National Priority List for the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and <br />Liability Act (ClrRCLA). As a natural resource trustee under CERCLA, the Department of <br />Energy is required to manage the resources wisely. The Environmental Protection Agency has <br />consistently stated that it is the Department of Energy's responsibility as the owner of the Rocky <br />Flats ;iuperfund site and as party to the Interagency agreement to ensure that any activity does not <br />result in an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment by spreading existing <br />contamination, does not interfere with ongoing CERCLA response activities and does not result <br />in increased response costs. The EPA concerns must be satisfied prior to any further activity. See <br />the attached letter dated June 15, 1994, for further explanation. <br />Reclsuaiation <br />The proposed reclamation plan may be inadequate to replace the habitat that may be destroyed <br />during; the mining operation. The Buffer Zone lands in question have not been mined, grazed or <br />occupied for recreauonal use in the last 45 years. The wetlands and shrub lands that may be <br />affected by the proximity of the mining activities may not be reclaimable, and raining could <br />represent an irreversible loss. Additionally, some ecologists believe that the biodiversity of the <br />plant t:ommunity on the plateau could not be duplicated by the current proposed plan. Exhibit J <br />of the permit states "The vegetation resource on the property is not considered unique or <br />significant." This sweeping statement may not be accurate and may warrant further investigation. <br />It is recommended that any re vegetation plan be coordinated with the EG&G Ecology Staff, who <br />are working to develop reclamation standards for the Site, and have information resources <br />available. <br />Other Issues <br />Jefferson County has requested that the Department of Energy sign the Western Aggregates <br />rezone application. The Department has not been required to sign applications in the past. We <br />have coordinated all Site internal resources with Western Aggregates on this matter and have <br />determined that it is in the best interest of both parties for us to take anon-support, non-hindrance <br />stance in order to protect the Federal Land and its resources. <br />The Department of Energy is currently drafting a Memorandum of Understanding between DOE <br />and Western Aggregates outlining a contractual agreement between the two parties governing the <br />expansion of the mining operation in our buffer zone. Both DOE and WAI believe this to <br />currently be the best vehicle to outline the parameters of the mining operation and to cover the <br />interests and concern. We believe that the reclamation, hydrologic, enduonmental compliance <br />and operational concerns should be included in the pemtit and enforced by the State of Colorado <br />regardless of any surface agreements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.