My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03694
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03694
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:36 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:10:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/27/1996
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO THE DIVISIONS PROPOSED DECISIONS ON PERMIT REVISION APPL NEW HORIZON MINE PERMIT C-81-0
From
NEW HORIZON MINE
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
PR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. .. <br />r <br />~ '. , <br />7) Section B, IA, 2, 'The applicant has made a demonstration, based on site speclfic <br />preclpitation rates, percent of grade, and soil properties, that use of altemative <br />spedfigtions for culvert sizing will not result in increased erosion. The Division therefore <br />proposes to approve the use of the altemative specfications For the culverts on the <br />extension of W 5th Street (4.03.1(4)(e)(vi)). WrC is wondering what this altemative <br />specifications for the culvert siting means?'? Please clarify. <br />8) Page 17, IIA 'The Giasion proposes to grant a small area exemption..." This is old <br />language. WrC has not asked recently for a small area exemption. <br />9) Page 17, IIB. "The Division proposes to approve temporary storage of add-...." This is <br />old language. Vt,FC has not asked recently for any temporary storage of add and tobc- <br />forrreng spoil for more than 30 days. <br />10) Page 18, G. 1, 'ire Division proposes....." Oid language. ~~uFC ~1as already mined within. <br />100 feet of a perennial stream. The livision approved this during the last pemvt6ng <br />process. <br />11) Page 19, third paragraph, third sentence. Typo. The sentence starts with lower case'Y". <br />12) Page 20, second paragraph,4th sentence. "Effects of runoff from reclaimed areas on the <br />quality..." I believe this is a typo and this whole sentence does not belong here. Same <br />sentence as the paragraph starts off with. <br />13) Page 20, IIIA This paragraph is old language and deals with the prime farmland issue <br />that has been reclassified. This paragraph is not relative anymore. <br />14) Page.21, V., B. 'The Division is proposing to approve...." Old language again. WrC has <br />not proposed any modified equation to deterrrune ma~dmum weight of explosives per delay. <br />WrC is proposing the use of seismograph recorders to aide in the design of blasts. <br />Please review 2.05.3(6)(a)-2 for further details. <br />15) Page 21, VI, A 'The Division proposes to approve the..." Old language again. WrC has <br />not proposed any new plans for disposal of acld-forming or tobc materials. <br />16) Page 22, VII ABB. 'The Division proposes..." Old language again. <br />17) Page 22, V!I, G. 2 ".....prime ramtland area...° V~k no iiN?:!eP have plrt>r fannlar,d. <br />Please modify. <br />Please review the above comments. I am available to answer any questions that may arise. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ross L. Cwbka, P. . <br />(c:\data\wpdata\revision\prt.doc) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.