Laserfiche WebLink
i ~ <br />i~ <br />• <br />PARGEI., MAURO, HULTIN & SPAANSTRA <br />A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />SUITE ]600 <br />~B OI CALIFORNIA STREET <br />DENVER. COLORwpp tl0202 <br />TELEPHONE 13031282~6A00 <br />DEAN R. MASSEY TELECOPIER UO3l ts~~]o.o <br />October 2, 1986 <br />Mr. David Berry <br />Colorado Mined Larid Reclamation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, Suite 423 <br />Denver, Colorado Ei0203 <br />RE: Glass Livestock Pit <br />M-B1-022 <br />Dear Dave: <br />• III III III III IIII III <br />999 <br />°Cr ~ 19es <br />MINEC~ . <br />Sao. neai. o~N t~~i E~~~v',~ro°~ <br />This letter i:. written to formally request approval of a <br />technical revision to the above-referenced permit. On April 24, <br />1986 the Board approved the conversion of the existing Limited <br />Impact Permit to a Regular 112 Permit, set bond at $10,000. and <br />restricted the operation to Ilreclamation only" activities. On May <br />28, 1986 University National Bank submitted a letter of credit in <br />the amount oL $7,500.00, thereby increasing the financial warranty <br />for that permit to the level required by the Board. <br />The technical revision contemplated in this letter and its <br />attachments provide for the resumption of operations under the <br />Regular 112 Permit approved in April. The attached materials <br />include a revised Legal Description (Exhibit A), revised <br />Pre-Mining and Mining Plan Maps (Exhibit C, 4 sheets), revised <br />Mining Plan (Exhibit D), revised Reclamation Plan (Exhibit E), <br />Reclamation Plan Maps (Exhibit F, 2 sheets) and documents <br />contirminq local goverment approval. The mine excavation <br />operation activity to be conducted under this technical revision <br />is intended to be a resumption of the activity permitted in the <br />original Limited Impact Permit. You will note that there is no <br />increase in the acreage beyond the 15.47 acres permitted in the <br />Regular 112 Permit and there are no significant deviations from <br />the previously approved mining and reclamation plans except for <br />those changes necessary to incorporate the Batch Plan operation. <br />Accordingly, under CMLRB Rule 1.9, a technical revision appears to <br />be the appropriate regulatory mechanism. <br />The attachments have been prepared in a manner which is <br />generally responsive to the comments included in your letter of <br />December 2, 1985. Those comments are listed below, along with the <br />