My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-03-11_REVISION - M1981302
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1997-03-11_REVISION - M1981302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 4:10:40 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:07:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/11/1997
Doc Name
AMENDMENT TO PERMIT M-81-302 DEEPE FARM PIT
From
BOULDER VALLEY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•luhn If. Iles non <br /> 3696 Silver Plume Lane <br /> Boulder, CO. 80303 RFCEIV�D <br /> tel (303) 543 9236 <br /> fax (303) 554 9032 <br /> 31 March 1997 APR 021997 <br /> Division or minerals&Geology <br /> Department of Minerals and Geology <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver 80203 <br /> Sirs, <br /> Subject: University of Colorado Flatirons Property <br /> I have learned from a recent letter to the Daily Camera that Western- <br /> Mobile has submitted an application for a reclamation plan ammendment <br /> that would reduce the acrage of lakes on this property from 38.1 to 4.2 <br /> acres and the number of lakes from five to two. <br /> This ammendment is in contradiction to the DMG end use of the property, <br /> is at variance with the past management of the land which respected the <br /> environment (in spite of its use as a gravel pit) and is perhaps a harbinger <br /> of rumored University intentions to cover this land with playing fields and <br /> parking lots. <br /> A portion of the flatirons property including the five lakes can be seen <br /> from my neighborhood. I wish to go on record of objecting to this <br /> amendment on the grounds that it reduces natural habitat and may well be <br /> the first step in preparing the land for uses that will be objectionable to <br /> neighbors. <br /> Yours sin ely <br /> John H. Beynon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.