My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-03-11_REVISION - M1981302
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1997-03-11_REVISION - M1981302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 4:10:40 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:07:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/11/1997
Doc Name
AMENDMENT TO PERMIT M-81-302 DEEPE FARM PIT
From
BOULDER VALLEY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 22 '97 14:18 CITY OF BOULDER P.4i13 <br /> j <br /> I <br /> Floodplain Implications <br /> The Land Berm <br /> The `Reclamation Plan, Deepe Pit,Western Mobile Boulder, Boulder, Colorado" drawing which <br /> accompanies the proposed reclamation plan amendment for the Deepe Farm Pit mining-site <br /> proposes a major land berm around the southern and eastern perimeter of the Deepe Farm Pit. <br /> This land berm constitutes a significant new land feature which was not included in either the <br /> 1989 or 1991 "Deepe Pit Reclamation Plan(s)" that the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board <br /> (MLRB)previously approved and constitutes a significant revision to reclamation of th;:Deepe <br /> Farm Pit mining site. <br /> It is worth noting that the Exhibit"E,"Reclamation Plan discussion in the"Notics of Filing <br /> Application" for the proposed reclamation plan amendment makes no reference to the addition of <br /> this major land berm. Specifically,these materials simply state that"the most significant feature <br /> of the Revised Reclamation Plan is the reduction in the total number of acres of exposed water <br /> surface." The City of Boulder believes that failure to reference and address the addition of the <br /> land berm in the application for the reclamation plan amendment misrepresents the significance <br /> this land feature has on the health, safety, and welfare of citizens in Boulder County and the City <br /> of Boulder_ For this reason, the City of Boulder requests that the DMG require Western Mobile <br /> to submit additional detailed information about the land berm and relevant impacts on t!.e <br /> surrounding community prior to any final determinations concerning the proposed reclamation <br /> plan amendment for the Deepe Farm Pit <br /> The City of Boulder understands that the Flatiron Companies, Western Mobile, and the University <br /> of Colorado propose to include the subject land berm in site reclamation for the Deepe Farm Pit <br /> as a flood protection barrier against the adverse flooding impacts the gravel mine has created for <br /> lands downstream of this mining site. Such an action is contrary to previous representations <br /> regarding the land berm which were the basis of Boulder County approval for this temporary land <br /> feature and is inconsistent with MLRB's adopted reclamation plan for the Deepe Farm Pit mining <br /> site. The land berm was originally graded on site as an interim measure to provide flood <br /> protection for the Deepe Farm Pit during gravel mining. Previous reclamation plans for the <br /> Deepe Farm Pit indicated that this land berm would be removed at the conclusion of miring <br /> operations. Western Mobile and preceding mining operators at the Deepe Farm Pit sitk! never <br /> represented that the land berm would remain as a long-term floodplain control facility. ji this <br /> respect, Western Mobile's surreptitious attempt to garner authorization for maintaining ' eland <br /> berm as a condition of final reclamation for the Deepe Farm Pit mining site represents a-complete <br /> lack of respect for the reclamation plan approval process and a total disregard for its previous <br /> commitments. <br /> In general, as noted above, the proposed reclamation plan amendment provides no description of <br /> the mining and reclamation need for the land berm, no analysis of its intended purpose, and no <br /> explanation for the absence of this land feature in the previously approved 1939 and 1991 <br /> reclamation plans for the Deepe Farm Pit Neither has Western Mobile provide a detailed <br /> technical evaluation of the land berm in the context of final reclamation for the mining site. This <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.