Laserfiche WebLink
• iii iiiiiniiiiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deputmern of N, Iural Resources <br />1 J 13 Sherman Ct., Room ? 15 I`yF ~~~ <br />Denver, Colorado fl0203 Iltll <br />Phone. 1303) 866-3567 <br />FA\: 1303) 832~A 106 <br />llEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br />TO: James Stevens Rov Romer <br /> <br />Bruce Humphries Governor <br /> lames S. Lochhead <br /> Execmive Direclor <br />FROM: James Dillie f~ • Michael B Long <br />V! Division Direclor <br />DATE: November 7, 1995 <br />RE: BMRI'S RESPONSE TO TR-015 - REQUIItEMENTS FOR EVALUATION OF <br />METHODOLOGIES TO DEMONSTRATE THE QUALTTY OF GROUNDWATER <br />BENEATH THE TAILINGS FACILITY AND COLLECTION POND <br />I reviewed BMRI's letter dated October 31, 1995 regarding the above-referenced item. <br />The fu•st thing I want to do is outline the facts, as supported by test data, which have been agreed <br />to by BMRI and the Division. Then I will comment on BMRI's response letter item by item. <br />As noted by previous analyses and borehole data, the Santa Fe aquifer underlies the tailings facility <br />and collection pond at the depth of 14Q± feet. The material above the aquifer is unsaturated <br />(vadose zone). The seepage velocity m the Santa Fe aquifer was determined to be 15 feet per year. <br />The alluvium and the Santa Fe deposits down to and including the aquifer interval is comprised of <br />heterogeneous material of interbedded clays, silty clays, silts, coarse sand and grdvels. This <br />mixture of material usually is very impermeable (as indicated by the low seepage velocity). The <br />recharge area of the Santa Fe aquifer is very small. <br />In paragraph 1 of BMRI's opening statement {page 1), it is stated that BMRI "is required to outline <br />the manner in which it will demonstrate to the Division's satisfaction the quality of groundwater <br />beneath the tailings facility and collection pond." The key words are that BMRI will "demonstrate <br />to the Division's satisfaction". <br />BMRI speaks of the angled borehole proposal that was initially submitted but is pow being <br />discounted, due to potential technical problems and a lack of interest from the various drilling <br />contractors that were sent bid requests. BMRI contends there are too many risk factors to employ <br />angled boreholes as a means of evaluating groundwater quality in the Santa Fe aquifer beneath the <br />tailings facility and the collection pond. BMRI states at the end of paragraph 1 of page 3 "we do <br />