My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03074
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:00:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:05:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT 3 CHARACTERIZATION OF AN UPSET CONDITION AT THE CARLTON TUNNEL
Type & Sequence
AM8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
these precipitates as being comprised of sulfate salts of magnesium, sodium, calcium, <br />manganese, and zinc. Denny and others (1930) make similar observations of the presence of <br />secondary sulfate salts comprised of variable mixtures of calcium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, <br />iron-aluminum sulfate, manganese-sulfate, manganese-silica, and aluminum-silica. <br />The precipitation of efflorescent salts along flow paths through the diatreme is expected to be a <br />yearly or seasonal occurrence, with the amount of salts that can accumulate being dependent on <br />the duration of the dry season. In all likelihood, these various salts also incorporate substantial <br />amounts of zinc into their crystal structure (Keith and others, 1999). These salts are potentially <br />the most important sources of zinc in the Cazlton Tunnel water because they are readily soluble <br />and may be rinsed from the subsurface during periods of high infiltration and flow through the <br />flow paths that lead to the Carlton Tunnel. <br />2.3 Hydrology <br />ABC (1998) provided a detailed evaluation of the water balance for the Carlton Tunnel. The <br />Carlton Tunnel was constructed between 1939 and 1941 for the purpose of draining underground <br />mine workings in the diatreme. The Carlton Tunnel also drains the granitic rock through which <br />it was constricted. At the current time, [he diatreme is largely unsaturated at elevations above <br />the Carlton Tunnel. Saturated conditions are believed to occur a[ elevations just above the <br />Carlton Tunnel (approximately 3,100 feet bgs), although the exact elevation is probably variable, <br />depending on localized occurrences of fractures. <br />Given the area of the diatreme and the calculated average annual infiltration rate, the amount of <br />water that enters the diatreme has been calculated at 1184 gpm (ABC, 1998). The diatreme is <br />much more permeable than the surrounding granite, hence it acts as a large well that receives <br />flows from the surrounding granite. The rate of inflow to the diatreme and ultimately to the <br />Cazlton Tunnel from the granite is estimated at 322 gpm (ABC, 1998). An additional 92 gpm is <br />estimated to infiltrate to the Carlton Tunnel from the surrounding granite. Considering these <br />sources, the total amount of water entering the Cazlton Tunnel has been estimated at 1593 gpm <br />(ABC, 1998), which is slightly greater than the average flow rate of 1585 gpm from the tunnel. <br /> <br />Cripp/c Crcck rY Viaar Gafrf rNining Compnn}' ShephcrA,Ni(lcr, lrtc. <br />IIDI.{M0.1'DIP-OR/VEl/pJ{bT.RrpnUttn[Amcnrl Ja 3 November?I, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.