My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03074
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:00:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:05:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT 3 CHARACTERIZATION OF AN UPSET CONDITION AT THE CARLTON TUNNEL
Type & Sequence
AM8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PRECIPITATION, CARLTON TUNNEL FLOW <br />RATES, AND ZINC CONCENTRATIONS <br />This section discusses the relationships between higher than normal precipitation events, higher <br />flows in the Carlton Tunnel, and elevated zinc concentrations in the Carlton Tunnel water. <br />4.1 Precipitation and Flow at the Carlton Tunnel <br />Between the dates of April 21 and June 1, 1999 (41 days), flow from Carlton Tunnel rose from <br />1,239 gpm to a peak of 1,887 gpm (a change of 648 gpm) (Figures 3 and 4). This corresponded <br />[o the period of record rainfall in spring and summer of 1999 that is discussed above and that <br />contributed to the upset condition. <br />There aze three storm events that could potentially have caused the large increase in flow from <br />the Carlton Tunnel. A snowstorm occurred between April 1 through 4, 1999 which produced the <br />equivalent of approximately 0.4 inches of water (Figure 4). A second snowstorm, that produced <br />the equivalent of 1.16 inches of water, was recorded between April 21 and 25 at the Bateman <br />• Creek weather station. A third snowstonn began on April 28 and ended on May 1, 1999, and <br />produced anear-record accumulation of 42 inches. Rain gauges at FFB, Guffey, Bateman Creek, <br />and Hunter show that the April 28 storm event contained the equivalent of between 1.5 and 3.4 <br />inches of water depending on the sampling station. Because these precipitation events occurred <br />as snow, much of their water content is expected to have infiltrated into the subsurface as the <br />snow slowly melted. <br />Shortly after the series of three snowstorms in April of 1999, flow rates from the Carlton Tunnel <br />began to increase (Figures 3 and 4). Above average rainfall in May through August of 1999 <br />(Figure 2) likely contributed to the increased flow rates from the Carlton Tunnel and maintaining <br />flows at high levels through the summer. <br />4.2 Flow and Zinc Canceotrations in the Carlton Tunnel <br />At about the same time that flow rates from the Carlton Tunnel increased after the 1999 spring <br />storms, zinc concentrations in Ilse flow also increased (Figures 5 and 6). Between the dates of <br />. April 21, 1999 and May 19, 1999 (28 days) potentially dissolved zinc concentrations in the <br />Carlton Tunnel increased from 0.036 mg/L to a peak of 0.78 mg/L. The data show that there is a <br />Cripple Crcek & Viemr Gold ,4lining Compnny Shepperd ,41i!lcr, lnc. <br />^D/AMONO~-ORIVE1100JbTReryrtLl~mrhmrnJ.AOC 6 Nm•emGer?1. /999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.