Laserfiche WebLink
29. Attached aze copies of objection letters from Michael and Robert Bliss, and Shazon and <br />Kevin Carbaugh regazding possible impacts to water resources in the surrounding area. Please <br />respond. <br />6.4.10 EXHIBIT J -Vegetation Information <br />30. In conformance with Rule 3.1.10(6), please provide a weed control plan that includes weed <br />control strategies for tamarix, and any thistle or knapweed species present at the site. <br />6.4.12 EXHIBIT L -Reclamation Costs <br />31. In conformance with Rule 6.4.12(1), please provide itemized demolition costs for removal of <br />all buildings, concrete foundations, paved surfaces, fuel tanks, and non-roadable mining <br />equipment as specified in Item 2 above. <br />32. In conformance with Rule 6.4.12(1), please clarify whether VCI intends to be bonded for <br />reclamation of all current disturbance plus all future or planned disturbances, or whether VCI <br />intends to be bonded for reclamation of a specified maximum disturbance at any one time. <br />33. The applicant specifies 67.89 total acres to be revegetated, 1.11 acres of shoreline to <br />revegetate, and 80.24 acres of Dry Land Mix to be applied. Please clarify the acreage of <br />shoreline to be revegetated, and the acreage of surrounding uplands to be revegetated. <br />34. Please clarify the push or haul distance for the 20,427 cubic yazds of stockpiled concrete <br />rubble to be backfilled during fmal reclamation. <br />6.4.13 EXHIBIT M -Other Permits and Licenses <br />35. Attached is a copy of review comments from the US Army Corps of Engineers. Please <br />respond. <br />6.4.19 EXHIBIT S -Permanent Man-made Structures <br />36. VCI has proposed mining within 200 feet of gas wells, gas lines, and associated gas <br />structures. Based upon review comments from Allen Sorenson, the Division requests that VCI <br />a} consider establishing larger setback distances from the man-made structures (particulazly <br />pipelines, gas lines, gas wells, gas tanks, and other associated features) than the 10 feet currently <br />proposed and should reconsider the efficacy of making an enforceable permit commitment to <br />maintain the excavation slope at no steeper than 1.25H:1 V, and <br />