My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV02794
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV02794
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:00:30 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:04:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/26/1993
Doc Name
Review Memo (Sampling Methods, Soils Resources, Topsoil Redis, Vegetation/Reveg)
From
TONY WALDRON
To
HARRY RANNEY
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Topsoil Redistribution <br />On page 2.05.4(2)d-7 there are several references made to not <br />salvaging certain topsoil if it is too wet. It is true that this <br />soil should not be salvaged in a wet condition however that does <br />not relieve the operator of the responsibility of salvaging ALL <br />available topsoil. Additionally, the operator does or should have <br />control over irrigating practices at the site. This should allow <br />them to prevent these soils from becoming saturated prior to <br />stripping. If this is absolutely impossible, a variance MAY be <br />granted but will need to be requested specifically. Otherwise this <br />language referring to not stripping should be stricken from the <br />text. <br />Vegetation Information and Revegatation <br />This is the area where a meeting would probably be the most <br />helpful.There are several areas within these sections where <br />clarifications need to be made. These include Post-mining land use, <br />success standards, proposed seed mix, and pest control plan, to <br />name a few. I think that if the Division responded to these issues <br />in a letter it has the potential to become a very drawn out <br />procedure with a lot of confusion, whereas if we could meet for <br />2-3 hours a lot of confusion could be resolved without an excessive <br />paper trail. <br />This concludes my preliminary review. The sooner a meeting can be <br />arranged to discuss any of these issues the better for remaining on <br />schedule for approval. <br />if you have any questions, please see me. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.