Laserfiche WebLink
.; . , <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />IN THE MATTER OF: <br />Formal Hearing Concerning the FINDINGS OF FACT <br />Division's Recommendation that CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br />the Reclamation Bond for the AND BOARD ORDER <br />Fruit no. 1 and 2 Mines be <br />Declared as Forfeited. <br />This matter was presented in a hearing, after proper notice, before <br />the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board ("Board") on March 23, <br />1994 in Room 318 of the Centennial Building at 1313 Sherman Street, <br />Denver, Colorado. The Board conducted the hearing to consider the <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology's ("Division") <br />recommendation that the Board declare the reclamation bond for the <br />Fruita no. 1 and 2 Mines as forfeited. <br />The hearing was held in accordance with C.R.S. 34-33-124(4) and 2 <br />CCR 407-2, Rule 3.04.1. A taped transcript was made of the <br />hearing. .Pursuant to the authority vested in the Board by C.R.S. <br />34=33-124(4) and 2 CCR 407-2,-Rule. 3.04.1 the.Bdard hereby-makes- <br />the following.Findings_of Fact, Conclusions of Law and $oard Order. <br />Findings of Fact <br />-i.- American Shield Coal Company has operated the Fruit No. 1 and <br />2 mines since 1986. The operator submitted a reclamation plan <br />for the mine site to the Division on November 20, 1989 in <br />response to an agreement with the Division. The reclamation <br />plan was subsequently approved by .the Division. <br />2. On September 24, 1991, the Division issued Notice of Violation <br />C-91-024 to the operator for failure to reclaim to approximate <br />original contour and to eliminate all highwalls. The Colorado <br />Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act requires that all <br />highwalls disturbed by coal mining operations be eliminated <br />(Rule 4.14.1(2)(a)). <br />3. Abatement for NOV C-91-024 was extended for a period of time <br />to allow for reconsideration of the reclamation plan by the <br />Division. During this time, regulation changes were proposed <br />by the Division for prelaw'highwalls. <br />4: NOV C-91-024 was modified to backfill and grade the upper or <br />Cameo bench so the highwalls are completely eliminated. <br />Abatement for the violation was due on December 14, 1993. <br />