Laserfiche WebLink
• III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • <br />/. E 999 <br />HART ENVIRONMENTAL <br />A Member of the Aggregate Fnvironmentrrl Resource Group, LLC.. Mrchne! J. HnrF ~ Associntrs <br />August 6, 2001 <br />Mr. James C. Stevens <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: MLRB Permit M-79-189 (S-4 Sand Pit) <br />Deaz Jim: <br />RECEIVED <br />AUG 0 7 2001 <br />Division of Minerals and Geelegy <br />This letter is written in response to your letter to me dated July 26, 2001. Your <br />letter indicated that you feel there are a number of "adequacy issues" with the Technical <br />Revision (TR) package that was submitted to the Division of Minerals and Geology <br />(DMG) on July 9, 2001. <br />As you know, the proposed TR (002) was prepared at your request because the <br />existing mining operation did not fully comport with the Mine Plan as approved by the <br />DMG under TR-001 on July 17, 1998. In point of fact, there is tittle material difference <br />between the Mine Plans for TR-001 and TR-002 except that the number of acres mined <br />under TR-002 is less than the number of acres mined under TR-001 and there are only <br />minor changes in the approved Reclamation Plan. <br />In your July 26, 2001, letter, you list the following "adequacy issues": <br />1. Topsoil and overburden; <br />2. Reclamation ofdisturbed uplands; <br />3. Relationship of backfill and excavated volumes; <br />4. Timing of revegetation efforts; <br />5. On-site structures; and <br />6. Relationship of Reclamation Plan with possible Master Plan. <br />In response to the above, please consider the following responses: <br />1'u u~, ~~~~~ <br />a,,,dJ,r r c, y~~„~~ <br />ll'dlanJ. Fimikniq <br />Fnivuvmnddl JLwagrnrcvl <br />L~~~J U~; F'Lmin~o) <br />Ni~l.,ni.riioe 1)ra~n~ <br />F'. mnllni~l e Znumq <br />