My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV02445
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV02445
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:00:04 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:00:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981032
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/30/1993
Doc Name
MEEKER MINE MR RE SEDIMENT LOSS FROM PRE MINE AREAS C-81-032
From
DMG
To
BARBARA PAVLIK
Type & Sequence
MR8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiu <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SL, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3 567 <br />FA%~ (3031 83 2-81 06 <br />DATE: July 30, 1993 <br />TO: Barbara Pavlik <br />J <br />FROM: Larry Routten v~ <br />OF.~~fO <br />tip, ' <br />Nc :, g <br />~ j ~: . <br />•~ <br />~B ]6 ~ <br />Roy Rnmer <br />Governor <br />ALChael B. Long <br />Division DircUnr <br />RE: Meeker Mine MR re. Sediment Loss From Pre-mine Areas <br />(C-81-032) <br />I reviewed the above referenced submittal from Enron. They propose <br />to estimate sediment loss from the mine area using the USLE to <br />estimate premine conditions and to compare sediment loss from <br />reclaimed areas to these values. Overall, the idea appears to be <br />appropriate. I do have two comments which should be passed on to <br />the operator. <br />1. Page M-12B of the submittal indicates that " accurate <br />measurements of sediment loss at the sites" will be made. Please <br />explain how these measurements will be made. <br />2. In the calculation of "C" values for use in the USLE, it <br />appears total vegetation cover values were used where ground cover <br />values should have been used. Ground cover includes litter, <br />grasses and some forbs. The ground cover value should not include <br />vegetative cover from shrubs. Using the ground cover value will <br />result in higher "C" values than those derived in the original <br />submittal. <br />m:\coal\lpr\73093 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.