My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV02375
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV02375
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:59:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:00:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/1/1994
Doc Name
CEC PN C-81-044 RENEWAL ADEQUACY RESPONSE
From
CYPRUS EMPIRE CORP
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The mined coal seams are not significant aquifers since there are <br />no known wells drawing water from coals in the area, and coal <br />ground water in not a significant component in the regional <br />hydrology. <br />Nevertheless, the following analysis was performed to estimate the <br />drawdown impacts of coal mining within the coal seams to be mined. <br />It is difficult to estimate accurately the drawdown impacts of coal <br />mining within the seams because the flows are small and sensitive <br />to assumptions, the effects of local features such as fractures may <br />out weigh distributed flow, and leakage from enveloping strata <br />cannot be readily quantified. Coals have low transmissivity <br />(estimated to be on the order of 30 sq. ft./day, or 224 <br />gal/ft/day). Mine inflows from the coal seams are very small, less <br />than 100 gallons per minute in either seam excluding local flows <br />associated with fractures (which draw ground water from strata <br />above and below the seams). Enveloping siltstones leak water to <br />the coal seams as the latter are dewatered, diminishing the <br />spreading of drawdown in the seams. <br />Gross aquifer impacts are also difficult to estimate for local <br />coals because there is no potentiometric basis. There are no <br />monitoring wells screened in the mined seams to determine drawdown <br />outside mined areas. There is typically a sharp discontinuity in <br />potentiometric head outside a mined panel, the destressed zone <br />being dewatered and unsaturated, so that computing drawdown as if <br />due to a very large well is not very practical. <br />McWhorter (1981) proposed empirical methods for computing flow into <br />coal faces, and distance/drawdown relations for leaky coal seams, <br />from sparse data. McWhorter gave the following equation relating <br />drawdown sx at distance x from a mined face where the drawdown at <br />the face is so and where ~ is the leakage factor": <br />s <br />sX <br />i <br />()=(T~. Ka) 2 <br />a <br />T~ is the coal transmissivity, and b and KB are thickness and <br />hydraulic conductivity for the leaky s~rata or "aquitard". While <br />it is difficult to determine these parameters, the analysis was <br />performed for a leakance range (represented by the envelope strata <br />hydraulic conductivity) which is thought to represent bounding <br />conditions. <br />For coal transmissivity, T~, equal to 30 ft2/day (from page 204.7- <br />19), so equal to 700 feet (initial head is approximately 700 feet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.