Laserfiche WebLink
continued, it is ikely that the recent fluctuations in piezometric <br />levels in the rout Creek are related to mine dewatering. <br />Nevertheless, the comment may have been prompted by discussion in <br />the PAP on page 2.05.6-5 which addressed in the subsequent response <br />to comment III. B. 14. <br />12. CEC has not completed research on aquifer usage for the <br />alluvial aquifer Trout Creek Sandstone, Middle Sandstone, and <br />White Sandstone. Upon completion of that research updated <br />information will a provided to DMG. <br />13. CEC has no a ditional information regarding which aquifer the <br />Lux well is compl ted in. CEC has shared information on file that <br />would indicate that the division has also attempted, <br />unsuccessfully, t make such a determination based on review of <br />drillers records nd analysis of water from that well. <br />14. The text on F <br />monitoring of the <br />mine in 1985 appE <br />Sandstone due to <br />that the potentia <br />this area was abo~ <br />time. This observ <br />subsequent statemi <br />of the E coal sea <br />Wells is above the <br />it is not likely t <br />the Trout Creek <br />overlying E coal ; <br />Mining in the Eag] <br />seam. It also occ <br />coal appears to be <br />the Trout Creek Sa <br />also occur in area <br />provide hydraulic <br />Finally, mining i. <br />mining in the unde <br />of significant mi <br />expected that mini <br />water levels in tY <br />15. The text on <br />the No. 5 and No. <br />sandstone aquife <br />Sandstone. No deg <br />the Twentymile Sa <br />following: <br />ige 205.6-5 of the PAP states that water quality <br />inflow from the 2 West Main fault in the No. 5 <br />irs to have been derived from the Trout Creek <br />.he similar chemical nature and the indication <br />ietric surface of the Trout Creek Sandstone in <br />the base of the F coal seam being mined at the <br />tion and conclusion is not inconsistent with the <br />nt in the PHC which asserts that since "the base <br />in the vicinity of both Trout Creek Sandstone <br />current potentiometric level in these two wells, <br />iat the fluctuations in potentiometric levels in <br />3ndstone is related to mine dewatering in the <br />~~ ~ <br />e No. 6 occurs in a different coal seam, the E <br />urs further up dip where the base of the E seam <br />above the corresponding potentiometric levels in <br />ndstone. Past and proposed mining in the E seam <br />a where there are no vertical faults which could <br />connection with the Trout Creek Sandstone. <br />~ the F coal seam in the location of proposed <br />rlying E seam did not encounter faults or areas <br />ne inflow from the floor. Thus, it is not <br />ng of the E seam coal will significantly affect <br />~ Trout Creek Sandstone. <br />age 2.05.6-12 states that mining activities at <br />i Mines have affected piezometric levels in two <br />the Middle Sandstone and the Trout Creek <br />fines in piezometric levels have been observed in <br />lstone. The text has been supplemented with the <br />The Trout Creek andstone piezometric levels are affected by <br />continued use of t e aquifer for mine water supply. Water level <br />drawdowns in the v cinity of both Trout Creek Sandstone wells have <br />been evaluated usi g the Theis, non-steady solution for drawdown <br />