Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M-91-097/CN-Ol First adequacy letter <br />1 1!25!93 <br />page 2 <br />Exhibit A -Site Description <br />As noted above, the easement description must be included herein. <br />Exhibit C -Pre-mining and Mining Plan Maps <br />The adjacent landowners' names shown do not include the landowners across the highway. If the <br />right-of-~aay is less than 200 feet wide, there are other owners wlticlt should be identified across <br />the highway also. Please confirm that this is verified and completed. <br />The adjacent landowners whose names are shown on the maps do not match the list of parties to <br />be notified, as identified on the "Addendum 1"list you provided. The list and/or the map must be <br />corrected. Please provide a list that matches the map, and verify that all appropriate parties are <br />identified on the map and that all are sent the notices. <br />The overhead powerline passes through the northern topsoil stockpile area (NW of the house). A <br />powerpole is even shown in the middle of the pile. Please clarify how such stockpiling will not <br />adversely impact this structure. <br />Related to this stockpile area is the question of the existing fenceline which passes through the <br />length of this stockpile area, north to south. The fence is shown on the property survey, included <br />under Exhibit A, but not on any other maps. The issue of setback distance from a perimeter fence <br />along the property boundary would be moot in this case, except that the fence does not run along <br />ttte property line/permit boundary line, but is located inside the line by 60-75 feet. The stockpile <br />is shown to cover that location. Will the fence be moved to the property line or will the stockpile <br />"footprint" be modified? <br />The "slope" acreage amounts shown on the table for the Phase 2 map sheet appear to represent <br />only the portions above water. Please confirm if this is correct. <br />The numbers on the acreage tables do not seem to add up correctly. Please verify that they are <br />correct, and if so, please explain why they are (e.g., for reasons of overlap, etc.) Also, it might <br />leave been clearer to include the 9.14-acre figure for the undisturbed/stockpile areas in the table. <br />The Phase 1 map includes notations that Ditch #2 will be abandoned and Ditch # 1 will be <br />relocated, though this conflicts with the narrative in Exhibit D and Exhibit S. Please clarify which <br />ditches are to be relocated or abandoned. <br />There are many topographic contours shown on the maps, for both existing and proposed <br />conditions. I have a bit of trouble "reading" [he slopes, however, due to the convergence, <br />divergence, and discontinuity of the contours and to the scarcity of labeled contours or spot <br />elevations. (Can another map with complete contour lines, darkened index contours, labeled <br />