My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV02237
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV02237
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:59:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:59:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/8/1991
Doc Name
Letter on Mistake on SR1 & Request to Increase Bond
From
MLRD
To
AMERICAN SHIELD COAL CO
Type & Sequence
SR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~'_ R ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1373 Sherman St., Roam 215 <br />Denver. CO 60203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />Rax: 303 632-8706 <br />STATE OF COLOR-ADO ~~ <br />of ~~~ <br />ti`O ,qy <br />. \'~ n . <br />"c~'~3 = a <br />' /876 ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Govemar <br />frea R. Banta. <br />Division Director <br />August 8, 1991 <br />Mr. Jack Crichton <br />American Shield Coal Company <br />10830 N. Central Expressway <br />Suite 175 <br />Dallas, TX 75231 <br />RE: Bond Reduction at the Fruita Mine (C-81-015) <br />Dear Mr. Crichton: <br />The Mined Land Reclamation Division approved and accepted a <br />reduction of the liability bond for the Fruita No. 1 and 2 Mines <br />from $141,000 to $90,000 in September, 1990. The reduction was <br />granted because planned disturbance was never fully implemented and <br />because partial reclamation of the site was done. <br />Following an Office of Surface Mining oversight inspection, the <br />Division realized that a portion of the bond reduction was <br />improperly approved. Rule 3.02.2(4)(d) of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board Regulations for Coal Mining allows for a <br />reduction of bond if methods of operation change, as was the case <br />at Fruita. However, the Division cannot reduce bond as a credit <br />for reclamation work. Liability for completed reclamation work can <br />only be reduced through the bond release process outlined in Rule <br />3.03. Therefore, the Division must rescind that portion of the <br />Fruita bond reduction granted as credit for reclamation work. <br />The Division has estimated the cost of reclamation work completed <br />prior to the bond reduction as $5380 (see enclosed Reclamation Cost <br />Summary). In order to adjust the bond properly the Division <br />proposes the following approach. <br />The original $141,000 bond should have been reduced by $45,620 to <br />$95,380 due to the fact that planned disturbance never completely <br />occurred. The Division improperly reduced the bond to $90,000. The <br />Division also proposed to release sixty percent ($54,000) of the <br />remaining bond on April 1, 1991 following a Phase I bond release <br />request from the operator. Sixty percent of $95,380 is $57,228. <br />Rather than the proposed release of $54,000, the Division will now <br />propose to release $57,228. This will leave a bond of $38,152 in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.