My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV02224
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV02224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:59:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:59:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/5/2001
Doc Name
ADEQUACY RESPONSES FOR JULY 05 2001 DMG LETTER
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Response -Pond OOIa has been redesigned. New Sedcad printouts aze attached. Appropriate <br />changes have been made on Figure Ex ] 5-14. <br />28. N-Ditch S-1 flows uphill at it's intersection with the permit boundary• at the far northwest <br />area of the Lorencito Canyon surface mine. Please clazify and/or correct this portion of the mine <br />plan. <br />Response -Permit boundary has been relocated and N-Ditch S-1 eliminate . I /_e <br />Additional Greystone comments: ~G,., ovl I <br />Z 1. It was noted that the design for Pond 8-2 had a fill height greater than 10 feet at the north end. <br />g' Part of flow to this pond has been rerouted to pond 8-1, and Pond 8-2 has been reduced in size. <br />t~n~ New Sedcad printouts aze attached and appropriate changes have been made on Figure Ex.15-14. <br />2. Correction in property boundary resulted in elimination of north ditch extension to <br />G~ Pond 2-3,and subsequent reduction in flow to pond. Pond size has been reduced. New Sedcad <br />printouts are attached and appropriate changes have been made on Figure Ex. 15-]4. <br />aK 3. Incorrect elevations were given for Pond 7-l. Pond has been redesigned. New Sedcad <br />printouts aze attached and appropriate changes have been made on Ex. 15-]4. <br />Rule 2.05.3(5) Operation Plan - Topsoil <br />• 29. Topsoil salvage areas are not shown on Map 2.05.3-3e for the Lorencito Canyon surface <br />mine as stated on page 2.05-33a of the proposed permit application. Salvage areas and depths <br />should be provided for this contour mining area. <br />©K <br />Response -Map 2.05.3-3e has been revised to include salvage areas and depths for the Lorencito <br />Canyon Surface Mine area. <br />30. Topsoil storage areas are depicted on Map 2.05.3-1 Mine Plan. Many of these proposed <br />azeas lie on top of fills and within the boundaries of proposed ponds. Rule 2.05.3(5) requires a <br />map prepazed according to the standards of Rule 2.10 of the proposed topsoil stockpiles. Please <br />5~ , submit a map that clearly depicts all proposed stockpiles in locations not proposed for other <br />Ca`es ~ disturbance. <br />Response -Map 2.05.3-2 includes the location of topsoil storage azeas for the five-yeaz mine <br />plan. I,t,l,a,Ye flees +~~,~1 50 -~i,- ~s ? <br />Rule 2.05.3(6) Operation Plan -Overburden <br />31. Page 2.05-39 of the proposed application incorrectly states that pre-blast surveys are not <br />required for residences within %: mile of the blasting area. Rule 4.08.2(1) identifies residents <br />within %: mile of the permit area as eligible for apre-blal'st~survey if they so choose. Please <br />• correct the text on this page. ~rov,~ a c~ of ~e ~"rtr%r ~~" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.