My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV02192
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV02192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:59:48 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:59:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/1/1999
Doc Name
UPDATE PHC TR 34 SANBORN CREEK MINE PN C-81-022 OXBOW MINING INC
From
DMG
To
OXBOW MINING INC
Type & Sequence
TR34
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(2) A submittal to the Division of any required written approval from the Colorado <br />Department of Public Health and the Environment (CDPHE) for this discharge <br />rate. The currently approved Colorado Water Quality Control Division NPDES <br />permit states that the average flow at outfall Olt (the mine water discharge <br />point) can not exceed 0.278 million gallons per day (193 gallons per minute) <br />while the maximum daily flow at that point can not exceed 0.38 million gallons <br />per day (264 gallons per minute). <br />(3) An update of the PHC [hat provides mass balance analyses [hat predict [he effect <br />of the mine water dischazge on the water quality in the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison River. The mass balance analyses should be performed using the <br />geochemical data from the most recent water quality analysis of the mine water <br />and should be run for those chemical constituents whose concentrations are <br />close to the compliance limits for receiving stream standazds. The Division <br />suggests that Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), chloride and iron be included in this <br />list. The Division also suggests that the analyses should use the lowest daily <br />minimum flow of the North Fork of the Gunnison River for each month that the <br />discharge will continue; <br />(4) If the mass balance analyses mentioned above demonstrate that the water <br />quality in the North Fork of the Gunnison River is approaching compliance <br />limits for material damage or CDPHE receiving stream standards, the Division <br />may require that the permit application be updated with the list of current <br />surface and ground water users within one half mile of the permit area. The <br />Division may require that the surface and ground water uses closest to the point <br />of dischazge of mine water be monitored for field pazameters. This hydrologic <br />monitoring would include representation of baseline conditions as well as for <br />the period during which the 2,000 gpm mine water discharge rate is being used; <br />(5) If the above mentioned analyses show that the water quality in the North Fork of <br />the Gunnison River will exceed compliance limits due to the mine water <br />discharge rate of 2,000 gpm, the Division will request that OMI lower the rate <br />of mine water discharge until the compliance limits aze met. The lower rate of <br />mine water discharge possibly would vary depending on the monthly variations <br />in the flow in the North Fork of the Gunnison River and would be based on <br />calculations submitted to the Division by OMI. <br />(6) During the period when the mine water dischazge rate is at 2,000 gpm, the <br />Division believes that a monthly full suite analysis and a weekly field analysis <br />should be performed on the mine water at the NPDES outfall; <br />B. If OMI intends to discharge mine water at the original maximum discharge rate of <br />425 gpm discussed in the PHC, then the Division would like OMI to submit to the <br />Division the following information: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.