My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV02176
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV02176
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:59:47 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:58:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/16/2007
Doc Name
Review Memo
From
Mike Boulay
To
Dan Mathews
Type & Sequence
TR22
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman S[., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Dan Mathews /, ~ Q <br />FROM: Mike Boulay /"'Y <br />DATE: May 16, 2007 <br />SUBJECT: Munger Canyon Mine, Permit No. C-1981-020 <br />Technical Revision No. 22 (TR-22) <br />Reclamation Plan Clarification <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />- &- <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Russell George <br />Ececutive Director <br />Ronald W. Cottony <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />I have reviewed J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc. responses (dated May 16, 2007) to our initial <br />adequacy review for TR-22. I have one remaining comment as indicated below. <br />4. Response accepted. <br />7. - 8. Responses accepted. <br />9. The Gob Pile Collection and Diversion 100-year SEDCAD run -Final Reclamation, <br />incorporates Structure #9 (CMP#2 Culvert) into the design but the culvert is not shown <br />on Figure 2.2-7A. It is our understanding that the culvert will not be permanent and <br />therefore should not be in the final reclamation design run. Please clarify this <br />discrepancy. It would also be helpful to have a Structure Networking Summary provided <br />in the SEDCAD run. <br />10.-11. Responses accepted. <br />Please let me know if you have any questions regarding my review. <br />C: Denver File <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.