Laserfiche WebLink
' MRY-20-1999 17 11 DWR DIVISION 3 719 589 6685 P.03 <br />• • <br />1 8. Has anyone from the Trinchera basin (frinchera Irrigation Company, Trinchera <br />Water Conservancy District, etc.) been noticed of this proposed action? <br />9. Have there been any sites in the Rito Seco drainage looked at? This would keep the <br />water in the Rito Seco drainage and would eliminate the trans-basin aspects. <br />10. What water quality monitoring will be required long term for this solution? (40 years) <br />11. What water quality standazds will be applicable? The minesite effluent evidences <br />elevated Manganese (9 PPM), elevated sulfate (900 PPM), elevated TDS, elevated <br />iron, and elevated fluorine levels over the water from RMF. <br />12. Will there be a backup plan if the water quality at the minesite degrades to below the <br />applicable standards? <br />13. Will there be a backup plan if the land application site becomes unusable weather <br />through constituent loading or by a change of ownership or other? <br />14. This plan will require going through the water court process to allow all water users a <br />chance to review the plan. <br />Without more supporting documentation, detail. and notice to potentially effected parties <br />this proposal cannot be evaluated on the merits. <br />BMG proposal preliminary review <br />05/20/99 <br />DNR/DWR/D1V3 <br />2 of 2 <br />TOTRL P.03 <br />