My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV01430
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV01430
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:59:02 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:52:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/30/2006
Doc Name
Response to DMG Adequacy Concerns
From
Savage & Savage
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR37
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Savage and Savage Environmental <br />practka/ so/utfons forenvlronmerrtallssue5 <br />4610 Haystack Drfve 970 674 8080 telephone <br />Wlndsor,Colondo 80550 9706748088 facsimile <br />savageandsavage®gwest.net <br />Mazch 27, 2006 <br />Ms. Janet Binns, Environmental Protection Specialist R~~' 4.'`6 «'® <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology ~ ~' <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 MAR 3 O 2006 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />ihsion of Minerals enC Cs~WY <br />Re: Response to CDMG Adequacy Concerns: Technical Revision 3~' <br />Keenesburg Mine (CDMG file C-1981-028) <br />Dear Ms. Binns: <br />This correspondence will provide our responses to concerns and issues raised in the <br />February 15, 2006 adequacy review of the proposed revision of revegetation standards at <br />the Coors Energy Company (CEC) Keenesburg Mine. Our responses follow the order <br />and numbering of the items in your correspondence. <br />1. It is CEC's position that CDMG staff is taking an overly narrow interpretation of Rule <br />4.15.7(2)(d) with respect to the methodology proposed in TR37. Rule 4.15.7(2xd) states, <br />in relevant part: <br />"A discussion of the comparisons to be made between the reclaimed and undisturbed <br />areas in order to demonstrate that the success criteria in 4.15.8, 4.15.9, or 4.15.10 have <br />been met. Upon approval by the Division, such comparisons or vegetative cover and <br />herbaceous productivity, woody plant density, species diversity, seasonai variety or other <br />applicable parameters shall be based on one or more of the following: <br />(i) Reference areas as described in 4.15.7(3); <br />(ii) Standards of vegetative cover or herbaceous productivity, or other <br />applicable parameters, established by reference to technical documents of the <br />United States Department of Agriculture, Unites States Department of the <br />Interior, ar other authorities. These documents must be approved by the <br />Division and the Director,..." <br />The proposed revisions to the vegetative cover and herbaceous productivity success <br />standards are based on both sampling of the Osgood Sand Reference Area and reclaimed <br />areas that, by the admission of a competent authority (Natural Resource Conservation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.