Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I , 24 <br />' <br /> 1 On the 19th of January the Division <br />' 2 issued its recommendation to the Board ire regard to <br /> 3 the amendment application. <br />' 4 On January 23, Battle Mountain submitted <br /> 5 a prehearing statement to the Board. I was just <br /> 6 i <br />i <br /> g <br />ven more cop <br />es of that and if the Board does not <br />' 7 have those copies, I will certainly pass those down, <br /> 8 and take one if you need one. <br />' 9 On the 24th of January, Battle Mountain <br /> l0 submitted additional reclamation cost estimate <br />' 11 information to the Division for review and analysis. <br />' 12 And then on the 25th of January, Battle <br /> 13 Mountain submitted additional commitments to the <br /> 14 Division regarding monitoring to occur at the <br /> 15 tailings facility. <br />' 16 So since October 20th, the filing date <br /> 17 of the amendment application, the Division has <br /> i <br />d <br />i <br />i <br /> 18 rev <br />ewe <br />the amendment appl <br />cation, we have rev <br />ewed <br />' 19 all objections received pertaining to the amendment <br /> 20 application, we have compiled a list of questions, <br />' 21 comments and concerns which we believe were <br /> 22 responsive not only to our technical concerns, but <br /> 23 also to the relevant conce <br />ts contained in the <br /> p <br />' 24 letters of objection we received in December, we <br /> 25 reviewed four responses from Battle Mountain <br /> <br /> AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br /> <br />