Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />21 <br />1 and then set the matter for the January Board <br />2 meeting, a formal public hearing that we are <br />3 conducting today. <br />4 On the 16th of December the Board issued <br />5 a prehearing order which detailed the ob.fectives and <br />6 dates to be accomplished by the Division, by the <br />7 objectors, and by Battle Mountain Resources, and <br />8 this was set out so that an orderly proceeding could <br />9 be conducted from that point in time until today, <br />l0 which would facilitate the exchange of information <br />11 to all interested people. <br />12 On December 15th we noticed all <br />13 objectors of the January hearing. On the 18th we <br />14 forwarded to all the objectors the prehea:cing order. <br />15 Also on that date, the 18th o:~ December, <br />16 the Division Concluded its review of the amendment <br />17 application and we issued our preliminary adequacy <br />18 review. And the preliminary adequacy review <br />19 consists of approximately 52 questions, comments and <br />20 concerns which were generated during our review of <br />21 the amendment application. We forwarded copies of <br />22 the adequacy review to Battle Mountain Resources as <br />23 well as all objectors. <br />24 On December 21, the Division a.nd Battle <br />25 Mountain met in the Division offices to di:ecuss and <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />