My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 12:51:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/15/1990
Doc Name
REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING VOLUME I APPLICATION OF BATTLE MTN RESOURCES INC IN COSTILLA
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i 1 <br />I 1 <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br />15 <br />1 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Mr. Chairman, <br />2 while we have this minute, I suggest the Board make <br />3 its own motion to eliminate Todd Sargent as a party <br />4 if he so chooses. <br />5 THE CHAIRMAN: I guess this ~ws all -- do <br />6 we want to eliminate him or is he just coming in <br />7 late? <br />8 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: I know he is not <br />9 here. I don't know -- I would recommend you call <br />10 for him and if he is not here, do it that way. <br />11 (Further discussion about seating not <br />12 herein transcribed.) <br />13 THE CHAIRMAN: Okay. Now the -- we need <br />14 to amend that motion to reflect the modification and <br />15 the procedures as reflected by the attorneys -- as <br />16 recommended by the attorneys. <br />17 Motion made. Are you amenable to that <br />18 as modified? <br />19 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: I am. <br />20 THE CHAIRMAN: Whoever seconded it, are <br />21 you amenable to that second? <br />22 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Yes. <br />23 THE CHAIRMAN: Okay. Are there any <br />24 other discussions on the motion to adopt the <br />25 prehearing order as proposed and as amended? Seeing <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.