Laserfiche WebLink
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monde Pascoe. tx~cunve Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATIOy D9 <br />DAVID C. SHELTON Direotor <br />Ricnartl D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />MEMORANDUM <br />June 15, 1982 <br />To: Mike Savage <br />From: David Craig <br />Re: Utility and Municipal Waste Disposal at the Trapper Mine <br />As a result of much research, I have decided to modify my stand on utility and <br />municipal waste disposal at the Trapper Mine. The research I did to develop <br />the "Baseline Water Quality and Qverburden Geochemistry Guidelines" and a con- <br />versation with an official at the Colorado Department of Health were the prin- <br />cipal factors which convinced me to modify my stand. Specifically, stipulations <br />12 and 13 from the draft findings document may be modified to include the es- <br />sence of the following discussion. <br />I now believe that utility and municipal waste can be disposed of in any of <br />the mine pits (including the Ashmore Pit) at the Trapper Mine if the proper <br />precautions are taken. It is still imperative that the waste not come in <br />contact with water. I feel that this standard can be achieved. To assure <br />this, we will need a plan which more specifically addresses waste disposal <br />at the mine. This plan will enable an inspector, both from the Division and <br />from the mine itself, to better evaluate if the necessary precautions are <br />being taken during day-to-day operations. The plan should contain both a <br />narrative description and a map. The specific components of both of these <br />are discussed below. <br />Narrative Description <br />The narrative description portion of the plan should specifically speak to <br />how and where the wastes will be disposed. The following is a list of the <br />components that the plan should contain. This list was worked out after much <br />consultation with the other members of the staff who are involved with this <br />issue. <br />1.) All utility and municipal waste shall be disposed of at least 20 feet <br />above the projected post-mining water table. This distance should allow <br />for a sufficient buffer zone between the waste and the ground-water ta- <br />ble so that the error factor in the water table predictive technique can <br />be accounted for. Also, should the waste become wet, the leachate could <br />pass through an attenuation zone before coming into contact with ground <br />water. The predictive technique used to calculate the post-mining water <br />AOO r ...........:..~ o..:u __ .... .. .... ,_. ,. _. <br />