My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV01339
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV01339
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:58:57 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/11/2000
Doc Name
TR 16 MINE PLAN CHANGE AND INCIDENTAL BOUNDARY CHANGE BOWIE NO 2 MINE PN C-96-083 BOWIE RESOURCES LT
From
DMG
To
BOWIE RESOURCES LTD
Type & Sequence
TR16
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3. For the sake of clarity, please remove the word "proposed "from "Proposed Shaft <br />Location No. 2" on revised Map 14, since the shaft has been completed. <br />The Division has no further concerns. Map No. 14 was revised accordingly in the <br />submittal dated July 24, 2000. <br />4. Please verify that there are no structures or resources in the proposed addition to the <br />permit area that have not already been accounted for in the Bowie No. 2 Mine permit <br />application. <br />The Division has no further concems. Jn the submittal dated July 24, 2000, BRL stated <br />that there were no new structures or renewable resources in the area of concern. <br />5. On permit page 2.05-68, it is stated that Map 23 water right codes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are <br />outside the effect of mining. With the increase in the permit area from approval of TR-16, <br />ar [east some of these locations may be affected by the proposed mining. Please add a <br />discussion on permit page 2.05-68 concerning the effects of mining on the hydrologic <br />quantity and quality of the water for these water rights. <br />The Division has no further concems. In the submittal dated July 24, 2000, permit text <br />pages 2.05-68, 2.05-100, 2.05-101, 2.05-113 and 2.05-114 were revised to include the <br />five water rights locations in the affected azea. Also, BRL referenced several approved <br />permit application pages that already discuss the impact of mining on these springs. BRL <br />pointed out that the chance for impacts to these water rights would be negligible, if any, <br />since the overburden above the water rights ranges from 1,040 feet to 1,360 feet thick. <br />Finally, BRL updated pages 36 through 40 to add longwall mining references to the text <br />describing the mining technique. <br />6. /n a letter dated July 10, 2000 and faxed to BRL on the same day, the Office of Surface <br />Mining has determined that the approval of TR-16 constitutes a federal mine plan action <br />and would make the Bowie No. 2 Mine a federal mine. <br />The Division understands that the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) is in the process of <br />preparing the background material for the mine plan action and will consider the <br />Secretarial approval for this technical revision once the Division renders a proposed <br />decision. Also, because approval of this technical revision would make the Bowie No. 2 <br />Mine a federal mine, the Division will issue a findings document for its proposed <br />decision for TR-16. <br />7. Enclosed is a memo-to-ftle stating that the U.S. Forest Service had no comments on TR- <br />16. Several other public agency comment tellers were faxed to you previously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.