Laserfiche WebLink
Aggregate Industries - WCR, Inc. <br />Amendment No.l - Jerottimus Property <br />Prrm:r fk M_99J1'id <br />Karen Topper '~/ <br />8120 E. 104t" Avenue <br />Henderson, CO 80640 <br />(303) 838-5636 <br />May 26, 2003 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology °/ <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Attn. Larry D. Oehler <br />RECEIVED <br />MAY 2 8 2GC? `~ <br />Division sf Minerals and Geology <br />RE: Aggregate Industries - WRC,-Inc. - <br />Cooley Reservoir and Fulton Wildlife Area Amendment No. 1- Jeronimus Property <br />Amendment to Permit No. M-99-034 / <br />Deaz Mr. Oehler: <br />This correspondence is in reference to Aggregate Industries -WRC, Ina (AI) regular (112) <br />operation reclamation permit application amendment to existing permit M-99-034. I had <br />previously registered my objections to the applicant's amendment application in a letter to <br />office dated April 3, 2003. One of my concerns was th issue of ground water quality? have <br />recently contacted a representative with the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado <br />Department of Health and Environment to inquire as to the status of the applicant's wastewater <br />discharge permit. I was surprised to learn that the Water Quality Control Division issued a <br />"general" wastewater dischazge permit to Aggregate Industries with an effective date of October <br />1, 2002. "General" permits for process water and stormwater are not site specific. This type of <br />permit does not address the reintroduction of existing adsorbed contaminants into the ground <br />water environment. Unlike asite-specific discharge permit, requests for "general" permits do <br />not have public notification or comment period. As such, the public was not afforded an <br />opportunity to bring their concerns forwazd and the Division did not review the site-specific <br />water quality ramifications of this proposed mining operation! <br />Having specifically been told by the applicant's representative that the permit application <br />documents I received were current, I am very disturbed why the applicant included an August <br />10, 1999 discharge permit certification letter in Appendix D of the application rather than the <br />new certification that was readily available. The current CDPS Industrial General Permit No. <br />COG-500000 has no requirements for ground water quality monitoring and has not been <br />reviewed for antidegradation. I bring this issue to your attention as another inconsistency in the <br />permit application documents, and request that the Division of Minerals and Geology assure that <br />the appropriate documents are submitted and that they meet the Division's rules and regulations. <br />