My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV01281
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV01281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:58:53 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/1/2001
Doc Name
TR-37 RECLAIMED WEST MINE SEDIMENT CONTROL BOWIE 1 MINE PN C-81-038 BOWIE RESOURCES LIMITED
From
DMG
To
J E STOVER & ASSOCIATES
Type & Sequence
TR37
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~~~'~~II~I~~II~~ I~~ <br />STATE OF COLC~t~~v <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />DIVISION O F <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-354 MINERAL S <br />FAX: (303)832-8106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br />October 1, 2001 MENINGMgAFEI'Y <br /> eil I Owens <br /> Governor <br />Jim Stover <br />P.E. <br />, Greg E. Walther <br />J.E. Stover & Associates Exec°°ve D re°or <br />2768 Com ass Drive <br />Suite 101 <br />P Michael B. Lang <br />, Divisl°n Duecror <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 <br />RE: Technical Revision No. 37, Reclaimed West Mine Sediment Control, Bowie No. 1 Mine, <br />Permit No. C-81-038, Bowie Resources Limited. <br />Dear Mr. Stover: <br />The Division has finished its review of Bowie Resources Limited's (BRL) responses, dated <br />September 13, 2001,to the Division's adequacy letter, dated September 5, 2001, for TR-37. <br />Attached is the Division's reclamation bond estimate for TR-37. The Division's liability <br />estimate is $8,800.00. This is $3,126.00 more than Bowie's estimate of $5,674.00. The <br />reason for this difference in estimates is that Bowie does not include any costs for <br />revegetation. Please let the Division know if this estimate is acceptable. <br />The Division has no further concerns. BRL accepts the Division's estimate of the <br />reclamation liability cost. Also, the Division holds sufficient bond for the proposed <br />activities in TR-37. <br />2. The proposed location for the two sedimentation ponds is on top of fill material. The <br />Division is concerned about the possibility of leakage of the pond water into the fill, <br />thereby possibly compromising the geotechnica! stability of the pond embankments and of <br />the fill. Also, significant leakage of the pond water into the fill would bypass a important <br />function of the pond, namely, water monitoring. Please comment. When commenting on <br />the pond embankments' geotechnica) stability, please reference Rule 4.05.9(8)(6). <br />The Division has no further concerns. In constructing the ponds, BRL has stated that they <br />will rework any soft areas in the soil at the embankment base and at the pond bottom. In <br />BRL's opinion, this reworking will provide a strong foundation for the pond <br />embankments and minimize pond leakage. <br />3. The hydrology designs use a curve number of 41 for the upland areas of oak and mixed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.