My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV01106
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV01106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:58:44 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:49:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/21/1997
Doc Name
MEMO REVIEW OF TR CRESSON PROJECT PN M-80-244
From
DMG
To
BERHAN KEFFELEW
Type & Sequence
TR25
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-- - <br />~II ~I~~I~~I~~~~~ ~~~ <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />131 J Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 1J031 8fib-J567 <br />FAX: 13031 83 2-81 06 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MEMO <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />E Kecutive Director <br />Date: May 21, 1997 <br />To: Berhan Keffelew <br />From: James Dillie <br />Re: Review of T hnical Revision, Cresson Project, Permit No. M-80-244 <br />Per your request, I reviewed the technical revision submittal from CC & V regarding the <br />expansion of Phase II heap leach facility. <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />With one exception, it appears the design and contraction specifications for the expansion azea <br />are identical to those which were approved for Phase 11 construction so they were not reviewed in <br />any great detail. The only difference is the requested modification to the structural fill material. <br />The operator proposes to increase the percentage passing the No. 200 sieve from the approved <br />25 percent or less to 50 percent or less and increase the plasticity index to 30 or less( from less <br />than 10). <br />Structural fill is used primarily for slope reduction and other miscellaneous site grading projects <br />in order to prepare an adequate base for placement of [he soil liner fill. Increasing the amount of <br />fines will, generally, increase the plasticity index which, in tutu, will probably increase cohesion <br />at the optimum moisture content, reduce cohesion when saturated and reduce the internal friction <br />angle. If slope stability is not deemed a problem than the proposed modified material would be <br />acceptable. <br />The operator completed slope stability analyses for two portions of the proposed expansion area. <br />Section 5.0 of the T.R, submittal presents the data, and results, of the geotechnical analyses for <br />leach pad stability. All failure modes considered in the study were evaluated according to the <br />Spencer Method. A seismic coefficient of 0.14g was used in all pseudo-static analyses <br />(consistent with that used for Phase II). Except for the proposed modified structural fill, material <br />design properties used in the stability analyses were previously approved. The proposed <br />modified structural fill was assigned an internal friction angle of 26 degrees with no cohesion. <br />Factors of safety were determined for two sections of the northern leach pad area. As noted on <br />drawing No. 10, a static factor of safety of 2.1 was calculated for section A-A~. The pseudo- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.