Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />J. J. Dudash - 4 - January 17, 2001 <br />11. For the new wells added to the monitoring program (DH-65, DH-66, DH-67-Abv, <br />DH-67D, DH-67-D-Blw, DH-67-6) please update Volume 111 of the permit <br />document with the appropriate well completion diagrams for each of the new <br />wells. <br />BRL-Well Completion Diagrams for DH-65, DH-66, DH-67-abv, DH-67D, and <br />DH-67-B1w are included for insertion into Volume III of the permit document. DH- <br />67-B was a monitoring well in the B-Seam. It has failed so a completion drawing <br />is not included. DH67-B will be removed from the list of monitoring points and <br />deleted from Map-9. <br />12. The Division is in the process of adopting changes to our surface and ground <br />water monitoring rules. The rule changes will incorporate compliance with <br />applicable ground water standards at established points of compliance. <br />Additional information regarding downgradient ground water quality maybe <br />requested at the time the new rules are promulgated and additional groundwater <br />monitoring wells maybe required to establish appropriate point(s) of compliance. <br />BRL - No response required. <br />13. Proposed page 2.05-80 appears to be missing two spring monitoring locations, <br />S2-9 and S2-10. Please revise this page appropriately. <br />BRL -The two spring locations were added to page 2.05-80. <br />14. In the baseline hydrology data presented in the PR-04 submittal, there are quite a <br />few springs, two surface water sites (Steph-up and TC-west) and four ground <br />water sites (DH-13, AW-2, AW-8 and AW-10) that are missing baseline full suite <br />analyses. This is even though, apparently, enough water was present to be <br />sampled. In addition, at some sites (S-10, Steph-up, DH-13, DH-57 and AW-2), <br />the field baseline data is absent, even though, apparently, water was present that <br />could have been sampled. Please explain. <br />Missino Full Suite Analysis <br />The surface water monitoring point identified as Steph-Up has never exhibited a <br />flow since monitoring was started in 1995, and therefore no full suite analysis is <br />possible. <br />The surface water monitoring point identified as TC-West has not been a part of <br />the water monitoring program at Bowie No. 2 Mine. This point, previously <br />monitored as SW01 at the Bowie No. 1 Mine, was included in the Bowie No. 2 <br />Annual Hydrolgic Monitoring in anticipation of a permit expansion that would <br />include a portion of the Bowie No. 1 coal reserves. This permit expansion is now <br />anticipated to occur many years in the future, and therefore at this point, no full <br />suite analysis is planned, and the table has been removed from the PR-04 <br />submittal. <br />