Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c. Is the permit boundary on the map supposed to follow the south section line of <br />sections 29 and 30 as implied by the description? <br />d. On the map, the permit azea contains most of the West'h of the NW '/< (and <br />possibly some of the SW '/4) of section 36, but that is not what appeazs in Exhibit 2A. <br />Rule 2.04.11 <br />2. Please add a statement in Exhibit 67 (Windy Gap Analysis) that speaks to any changes <br />in water depletion (or lack of changes) occurring with the mine expansion. <br />Rule 2.04.12 <br />3. Please extend the prime farmland determination into the new azea covered by the <br />permit revision application. <br />Rule 2.05.3 (3) (C) (v) (A) <br />4. Given the scale of the maps it is difficu]t to determine the distances accurately in the <br />NE corner of the permit azea. Please confirm that the proposed permit area is not within <br />100 feet (as measured horizontally) of a public road, as applied in this rule. <br />Rule 2.05.6(6) <br />5. Panel 18A undermines an azea where the state highway lies on the same side of the <br />river (south side of the North Fork of the Gunnison). Please discuss in the subsidence <br />evaluation the proximity of the slopes overlying Panel 18A to the highway and evaluate <br />potential hazazds. Please discuss any actions planned by MCC to mitigate potential <br />hazards. <br />6. None of the information submitted and reviewed for PR-11 indicated the presence of <br />structures or renewable resource lands in the lease area. The applicant should include <br />permit text that indicates the presence or absence of structures or renewable resource <br />lands in the West Flatiron lease tract. <br />7. If applicable, the worst possible consequences due to subsidence (rockfall) relative to <br />any structures or renewable resource lands should be discussed in the permit text. If <br />necessary, monitoring or mitigation measures should also be specifically addressed in the <br />permit text. <br />8. On page 2.05-150 the statement is made that a stipulation in the Environmental <br />Assessment requires a riparian protection zone azound Raven Creek, prohibiting surface <br />