My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV01002
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV01002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:58:38 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:49:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/29/1994
Doc Name
FAX COVER WESTERN AGGREGATES
From
US DEPT OF ENERGY
To
MR KEFFELEW
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL-29-94 FRI 15;32 • FAX N0. 303 96~ 775 P, 04 <br />„ . <br />CE]iCLA <br />The existing permitted acreage plus the 425 acre expansion azea are located on lands owned by <br />the United States Department of Energy, Rocky Flats. The whole of the Site is listed on the <br />National Priority List for the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and <br />Liability Act (CERCLA). As a natural resource trustee under CERCLA, the Department of <br />Energy is required to manage the resources wisely. The Environmental Protection Agency has <br />consistently stated that it is the Department of Energy's responsibility as the owner of the Rocky <br />Flats 5uperfund site and as party to the Interagency agreement to ensure that any activity does not <br />result in an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment by spreading existing <br />contamination, does not interfere with ongoing CERCLA response activities and does not result <br />in increased response coats, The EPA concerns must be satisfied prior to any further activity. See <br />the attached letter dated June 15, 1994, for further explanation. <br />Reclamation <br />The: proposed reclamation plan may be inadequate to replace the habitat that may be destroyed <br />during the mining operation. The Buffer Zoae lands in question have not been mined, grazed or <br />occupied for recreational use for many years. The wetlands and shrub lands that may be affected <br />by the proximity of the mining activities may not be reclaimable, and mining could represent an <br />irreversible loss. Additionally, some ecologists believe that the biodiversity of the plant <br />conununity on the plateau could not be duplicated by the current proposed plan. Exhibit J of the <br />permit states "The vegetation resource on the property is not constdered unique or significant." <br />This statement may warrant further investigation. <br />It is recommended that any re-vegetation plan be coordinated with the EG&G Ecology Staff, who <br />aze working to develop reclamation standazds for the Site, and have information resources <br />available. <br />Outer Issues <br />Jef:Cerson County has requested that the Department of Energy sign the Western Aggregates <br />rezone application. The Department has not been required to srgn applications in the past. We <br />have determined that anon-suppor4 non-hindrance stance in order to protect the Federal Land and <br />its :resources is the best course of action. <br />Th~a Department of Energy is currently drafting a Memorandum of Understanding between DOE <br />anti Western Aggregates outlining a contractual agreement between the two parties governing the <br />expansion of the mitring operation in our buffer zone. Both DOE and WAI belteve this to <br />ewrently be the best vehicle to outline the pazameters of the mining operation and to cover the <br />inUarests and concern. We believe that the reclamation, hydrologic, environmental compliance <br />anti operational concerns should also be included is the permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.