Laserfiche WebLink
l <br />'9 <br />December 5, 1980 <br /> <br />Mr. Lee Tucker <br />Tucker Construction Company <br />4563 E. County Road 68 <br />Wellington, Colorado 80549 <br />RE: Tucker Aggregate Permit Amendment <br />Our File: lE80-2 <br />Dear Mr. Tucker: <br />III III III III I'11111 <br />May we request som additional Information regarding the above permit <br />amendment) <br />.~ ;. <br />EXHIBIT C-2 - Mining Plan Map <br />1. On the amended mining plan map submitted, an area indicated as the <br />watchman's housing is shown outlined beyond the affected area. For <br />the sake of my records, are you requesting additional acreage for <br />this area (if so, how much?), or did you come to an agreement with <br />Jim McArdle regarding substitution of lands formerly required for <br />dams and diversions? <br />2. Is the total affected acreage to remain at 220? No <br />?3. Please send a copy of the soil and overburden results analyzed by <br />CSU. -1...~ 10. i.~ ~.ic <br />4. Please elaborate on the "over the shoulder" mining operation proposed <br />for Unit 4, with particular regards to replacement of overburden, <br />grading, and topsoiling conteoporous with mining. Your application <br />Is unclear as to whether soil (solum) from Unit 4 will be segregated <br />and stockpiled, or so 11 anA overburden will be collectively excavated <br />- and replaced, in • mixed state, behind you es mining progresses south. <br />This apparent confusion stems from the fact thst descriptions of the <br />Ascalon series soils at the site have a typical 8" surface layer and <br />,> a 16" subsoil, but you propose to strip 0-10" of topsoil and overbur- <br />den. I recognize local variations in soli thickness, but •re you <br />~ using the term overburden syranyanus with subsoil? <br />5. Please elaborste on the function of the diversion ditch. How much water <br />(salsture) have you encountered? is the ditch intended to drain signi- <br />ficant anaunts of water? <br />J <br />