My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV00511
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV00511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:58:11 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:46:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/13/1993
Doc Name
SENECA II MINE C-80-005 TR 27 POSTMINING LAND USE PLAN
From
PEABODY WESTERN COAL CO
To
DOW
Type & Sequence
TR27
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jim Morris <br />December 9, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />Reclaimed area monitoring data for the Seneca II Mine have been <br />collected since 1985. These data were used to determine shrub <br />establishment and development patterns in areas where both <br />extensive and intensive reclamation practices have been applied. <br />Discussions with other operators in northwest Colorado were used <br />to determine what additional practices should be employed, and <br />what level of success these operators anticipate based on past <br />and present practices. It does appear, however, that with the <br />exception of areas receiving very intensive and costly shrub <br />establishment procedures, the surface mines in northwest <br />Colorado will probably not be able to meet a 1000 stem/acre <br />average density. Based on the above, PWCC proposed a more <br />realistic standard in revised Tab 13. <br />An overall standard less than 1000 stems/acre does not <br />necessarily reflect a lack of success in woody plant <br />reestablishment. It reflects a combination of ecological <br />principles, operational practices, and regulatory constraints. <br />Monitoring data from the Seneca Mine indicates a 1000 stem/acre <br />average density will be very difficult when a level of <br />succession is considered for a 10, 15, or 20-year time frame. <br />Significant changes in site conditions and other controlling <br />factors affect succession. Very competitive herbaceous <br />communities are established to stabilize the site, and these <br />herbaceous communities may also reflect long-term mid- <br />successional levels for woody plant communities. Reclaimed <br />plant communities may not follow the same pathways and patterns <br />of succession as in native communities. It is possible that <br />reclaimed areas may follow divergent pathways to somewhat <br />altered climax communities. Temporal factors must be an <br />important consideration in establishing the standard. For a <br />discussion on this subject, please refer to the recent <br />publication "Evaluating Reclamation Success: The Ecological <br />Consideration" - Proceedings of a Symposium. Chambers, J.C., <br />G.L. Wade, eds. Gen. Tech Rep. NE-164. USDA-USFS, Northeastern <br />Forest Exp. Station. <br />The distribution of shrubs in reclaimed areas is generally <br />highly variable and will result in large scale and costly <br />sampling efforts. These data reflect populations which are not <br />normally distributed. The contribution of high density areas to <br />the average density will be quickly reduced when zero or low <br />density plots are encountered. The average number of woody <br />plants per acre may not be high, but the large diversity in <br />stand density (reflected in large sample variances) creates the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.