My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-06-08_REVISION - M1999069
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1999069
>
2007-06-08_REVISION - M1999069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:25:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:45:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999069
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/8/2007
Doc Name
Acreage Release Request
From
Applegate Group, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tom Schreiner <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />May 31, 2007 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />for the site, approved by the Office, and a reclamation plan was formulated. As stated in <br />Exhibit E of the Reclamation Permit Application, the final reclamation plan for this portion of <br />the site was to return the disturbed ground to pastureland and to match the reclaimed grade of the <br />property to the pre-existing grade.- Consistent with Exhibit E, backfilling of the mined pit and <br />grading activities. were concurrent with mining operations. <br />As listed below, reclamation' of the. site has complied with additional subsections of the <br />Reclamation Performance Standards. <br />3.1.5 Materials Handling <br />To meet requirements, the following activities were performed. <br />• Grading created .a final -topography appropriate for the permitted final land use, <br />pastureland. <br />•: Backfilling was performed with adequate compaction for stability. No structures aze <br />' planned for the site, so compaction testing was not necessary. <br />• No mining highwalls were left on the site and all slopes were graded to control potential <br />_ erosion and siltation. <br />•. Grading of all slopes was,done as mining progressed. <br />• No refuse, acid-forming, or toxic producing materials were mined or produced on the site. <br />• No drill or auger holes were part of.the mining operations and no adits or shafts were <br />created. <br />• No._significant slopes were left on the site: Slopes aze consistent with the pre-existing <br />topography and appropriate for use as pastureland. ' <br />• The reclamation choice. for pastureland may require that the area be plowed, planted and <br />mowed. The azea is graded so farm machinery can traverse. the, area when needed. <br />s Structural fill was not used to backfill the excavated pit. <br />• Material that could potentially cause unauthorized releases of pollutants to the surface <br />drainage system was not mined or disposed of within the affected azea. <br />• No unauthorized release of pollutants to groundwater occurred from materials mined or <br />= handled within the perniit azea. <br />All baclcfilling and grading was done as mining progressed. Final grading was, completed in <br />ilie summer of 2005 after the completion of mining activities. Revegetation at the site was <br />performed in Fall 2005. <br />3.1.6 Water -General Requirements <br />Disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land and surrounding azea were <br />minimized. <br />• The operator has complied with applicable Colorado water laws and regulations <br />governing injury to existing water rights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.