Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t~(arch 22, 1995 <br />Mr. John E. Hardaway <br />page 2 <br />In order to insure that any studies [he Di+iston requires CC&V to perform will be adequate to address the above <br />conccros. and [hat CC&V is provided ++ith a more formal means to provide counter-proposals, the permit will be <br />amended to incorporate a compliance schedule With specific actions that must be taken. This will be sent to public <br />nonce for your review and comment. <br />Permittine of the Roosevelt Tunnel Drainaee <br />The data and associated information which you submitted in your letter of January l7, 1995, provided insight into the <br />dynamics of the water quality characteristics of the Roosevelt Ttrnnel drainage. We have determined that it will be <br />necessary [o include the Roosevelt Tunnel drainage in the existing permit for the Carlton Tunnel for the following <br />reasons: <br />I) at least portions of the Roosevelt Tunnel lie directly underneath properties owned by Cripple Creek <br />and Victor Gold, or lie in undergroand zones that may intercept groundwater flow emanating from <br />CC&V properties, or are connected to other undergound workings ++•hich may carry water originally <br />emanating from CCRV propemes; <br />2) initial discussions with personnel from the State Division of Minerals and Geology indicate that, from a <br />geological perspective. there is a significant potential for drainage from CC&V properties to enter the <br />Roosevelt Ttmnel; <br />3) similar discussions +vith the DMG indicate that flow may originate in the Roosevelt Tunnel at a point <br />further inside the mountain than what CC&V has indicated, and it is possible that some hydraulic <br />connection may exist benveen the flows that eventually exit from the separate Carlton and Roosevelt <br />Tunnels. <br />4) it is understood that CC&V is either the sole or principal operator maintaining the Roosevelt Tunnel, <br />and that i[ is matn[aincd for the company's own purposes: <br />~) regazdless of its origin. the tunnel is point source discharge of water n hlch contains pollutants. <br />In order to incorporate the Roosevelt Tunnel into the existing permit, +ve will include effluent limitations and monitoring <br />conditions in the same permit amendment that will be processed for the Carlton Tunnel flow monitoring issue. Again, <br />this will be sent to public notice, giving you another opportunity to submit written comments. <br />Sinccrch•, <br />'f~='/i2 <br />Patricia A. Nelson, P.E. <br />Indus[nal Unit Chief <br />Permits and Enforcement Section <br />WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION <br />xc Rich Horstmann, WQCD <br />fiery Soldano. WQCD <br />George Moravec, WQCD <br />Fred Dowsett, HMWMD <br />Berhan Kcmcw, Division oCMinerals and Geology <br />Roger Flynn Western Mining Action Group <br />Local Hcahh Dcpanment <br />USEPA Region VIII. Water Division <br />CDPS Permit No. CO-0024562 Permit lilt <br />