Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 2 <br />Kathleen Welt <br />January 7, 1993 <br />ditches? Calculations should be provided to be <br />incorporated into the permit application. <br />4. Rather than placing the technical revision submittal at <br />the front of Exhibit 51, this information should be <br />incorporated into the exhibit. A permit application can <br />get very confusing if old information is left in the <br />permit. Therefore, references to Phase V should be <br />omitted from the text, cross-sections should be updated, <br />and update and omit anything else that has been changed <br />with this revision. The stability analysis that MCC has <br />provided should be included in this Exhibit, but it should <br />appear in the portion of the Exhibit that is appropriate <br />for this type of document. <br />5. Please submit the affidavit of publication for this <br />technical revision. <br />Please provide MCC's responses by January 29, 1993, to allow the <br />Division sufficient time to review the responses and provide a <br />proposed decision by February 8, 1993. <br />Please call if you have any questions regarding the Division's <br />adequacy concerns. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Christine E. <br />Reclamation <br />007.TR63 <br />