REV00196 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

II. Ground Water Heading Numerous portions of the permit application document concerning ground water quality must be modified to reflect updated information from monitoring. For instance: a. The estimate of 2 percent salt loading increase from both mine facilities (Exhibit 6, Page 1) may need to be corrected to reflect more recent data gathered from stream sampling and ground water monitoring. 2. Portions of the permit application document may also have to be modified to reflect changes in ground water quantity, especially mine discharge (Exhibit 6, Page 1). For example, the original estimate of 180 gpm for the Golden Eagle (Maxwell) mine probably has changed due to additional development work. Anew value based on the additional area exposed should be developed. This applies to the New Elk Mine as well. 3. Since some areas around the mine perimeter are being developed for ranchettes and recreational home sites that would probably require well water, it is important that the mine operators be aware of any affect their operations might have on this ground water resource. Since by definition, Colorado Law states that first priority water rights (primacy) will be given to the highest and best use of that water, which in this case is domestic use. Therefore, returning a well such as LA-212 to monitoring status may be necessary to monitor the bedrock aquifers. Presently no monitoring of bedrock aquifers occurs except for springs and seeps. 4. Variations in bedrock (formational) permeability and storage may be updated by including recent data acquired from the latest exploration program in or near Apache Canyon and elsewhere. This should be added to the current baseline data to enhance the database. a. If values change significantly it may then become necessary to recompute mine inflows using the formulas found in the permit application (McWhorter and Sunada). 5. The elimination of water quality test parameters for heavy metals in 1984-85 is unjustified; especially, for Pb and Se since these show up in relatively high concentrations in Wells LA-218A/221A, PAW-2 (November 27, 1984) and mine discharge. Some of these concentrations may be in excess of regulatory standards at times. Additionally, fluorine increases at various monitoring points on occasions. Therefore, it is probably necessary to retain at least one monitoring point that tests for heavy metals and other constituents (such as F) or some select heavy metals representative of heavy metal suites. 6. To reiterate, maps and discussion of New Elk Mine indicate the possible presence of a NNW trending linear element in the